ISS Visibility If Painted Black?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quantula
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Iss
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the International Space Station (ISS) would be visible if painted black. It is suggested that a rough matte surface would reduce visibility due to light scattering, especially in direct sunlight. The potential use of anti-reflective coatings, similar to those on the B-2 Stealth Bomber, is mentioned as a way to minimize reflectivity. Additionally, a carbon nanotube coating is proposed, though visibility would likely only be possible when the ISS passes in front of the moon. Overall, the consensus is that while visibility could be reduced, it may not be entirely eliminated.
Quantula
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey All,

Would the International Space Station be visible to the naked eye if it was painted black?

Thanks for any replies!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
Assuming it was a very (rough) matte surface paint I suppose it wouldn't be visible, but direct sunlight up there is concentrated. The rougher the surface, light scatters in more directions, thus making the Fresnel effect (stronger reflection at angles) much less noticeable. Interesting question by the way! (:
 
Thanks for the reply! I’ll have to research anti-reflective coatings. Maybe the stuff they use on the B-2 Stealth Bomber would be sufficient to cut any noticeable reflectivity.

If mass production was feasible, one could cover the station in this carbon nanotube coating (http://www.nasa.gov/topics/technology/features/super-black-material.html)! You might be able to see it pass in front of the moon, but it would happen so quickly I doubt it would be noticeable.
 
Quantula said:
Thanks for the reply! I’ll have to research anti-reflective coatings. Maybe the stuff they use on the B-2 Stealth Bomber would be sufficient to cut any noticeable reflectivity.

If mass production was feasible, one could cover the station in this carbon nanotube coating (http://www.nasa.gov/topics/technology/features/super-black-material.html)! You might be able to see it pass in front of the moon, but it would happen so quickly I doubt it would be noticeable.
No problem Quantula! Interesting article, it appears light is scattered inside and the micro tubes pick up relatively the same reflection, impressive.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
3I/ATLAS, also known as C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and formerly designated as A11pl3Z, is an iinterstellar comet. It was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station at Río Hurtado, Chile on 1 July 2025. Note: it was mentioned (as A11pl3Z) by DaveE in a new member's introductory thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/brian-cox-lead-me-here.1081670/post-7274146 https://earthsky.org/space/new-interstellar-object-candidate-heading-toward-the-sun-a11pl3z/ One...
Back
Top