ISS Visibility If Painted Black?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quantula
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Iss
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The visibility of the International Space Station (ISS) when painted black is significantly affected by surface texture and material properties. A rough matte surface would likely reduce visibility due to light scattering, while specialized coatings like those used on the B-2 Stealth Bomber could further minimize reflectivity. The discussion highlights the potential use of carbon nanotube coatings, which could absorb light effectively, making the ISS less noticeable against the night sky. However, even with these coatings, the ISS would only be briefly visible against celestial bodies like the moon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of light scattering principles
  • Familiarity with anti-reflective coatings
  • Knowledge of carbon nanotube technology
  • Basic concepts of the Fresnel effect
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of carbon nanotube coatings
  • Learn about anti-reflective coatings used in aerospace applications
  • Explore the Fresnel effect in optics
  • Investigate the visibility of satellites in different lighting conditions
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, materials scientists, and anyone interested in the optical properties of coatings and their applications in reducing visibility of spacecraft.

Quantula
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey All,

Would the International Space Station be visible to the naked eye if it was painted black?

Thanks for any replies!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
Assuming it was a very (rough) matte surface paint I suppose it wouldn't be visible, but direct sunlight up there is concentrated. The rougher the surface, light scatters in more directions, thus making the Fresnel effect (stronger reflection at angles) much less noticeable. Interesting question by the way! (:
 
Thanks for the reply! I’ll have to research anti-reflective coatings. Maybe the stuff they use on the B-2 Stealth Bomber would be sufficient to cut any noticeable reflectivity.

If mass production was feasible, one could cover the station in this carbon nanotube coating (http://www.nasa.gov/topics/technology/features/super-black-material.html)! You might be able to see it pass in front of the moon, but it would happen so quickly I doubt it would be noticeable.
 
Quantula said:
Thanks for the reply! I’ll have to research anti-reflective coatings. Maybe the stuff they use on the B-2 Stealth Bomber would be sufficient to cut any noticeable reflectivity.

If mass production was feasible, one could cover the station in this carbon nanotube coating (http://www.nasa.gov/topics/technology/features/super-black-material.html)! You might be able to see it pass in front of the moon, but it would happen so quickly I doubt it would be noticeable.
No problem Quantula! Interesting article, it appears light is scattered inside and the micro tubes pick up relatively the same reflection, impressive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
771
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K