IV curve for voltage across shunt for probe current (Helimak experiment)

1a2
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let's say I have a Langmuir probe I-V characteristic from the Helimak experiment. The plasma ions are singly ionized argon. The probe has an effective area of 0.000016 m^2. Estimate the floating potential, electron density,
and temperature. Based only on the nature of the data itself, estimate the uncertainties in these values. This data was taken by sweeping the bias voltage at a frequency of a few Hertz and averaging over 15s to reduce the effect of fluctuations, which are still visible in the
data.

The first column is the voltage applied to the probe. The second is the voltage across a 5-kilo OHm shunt to measure probe current

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution





What I am confused about is that when I plotted the values given in the problem, the curve resembles an IV curve. However, since the y-values are "voltage across a 5-kilo OHm shunt to measure probe current", how would I convert this to current, and thus be able to solve for the floating potential, electron density,
and temperature. ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe I'm missing something, but what would be wrong with just using V=I*R? You know resistance and voltage across the resistor.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top