Kc = 1.88 for 2HI(g) ↔ H2(g) + I2(g)

AI Thread Summary
To find Kc for the reaction H2(g) + I2(g) ↔ 2HI(g), the relationship between Kc values for related reactions must be used. Given Kc = 1.37 for HI(g) ↔ 1/2 H2(g) + 1/2 I2(g), reversing and doubling this reaction leads to Kc2 = Kc1^2. Therefore, Kc2 can be calculated as Kc2 = (1.37)^2, resulting in Kc2 = 1.8769. Rounding to three decimal places, Kc for the desired reaction is 1.877.
Madelin Pierce
Messages
24
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Kc = 1.37 for HI(g) ↔ 1/2 H2(g) + 1/2 I2(g). What is Kc (to 3 decimal places) for H2(g) + I2(g) ↔ 2HI(g)?

Homework Equations


Kc= Products/Reactants, Ice Tables

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried an ice table, but I’m not sure what to do with the Kc value I’m given when I have to another Kc value
 
Physics news on Phys.org
$$K_{c_1} = 1.37 = \dfrac{[H_2]^{1/2} [I_2]^{1/2}}{[HI]}$$ and $$K_{c_2} = \dfrac{[HI]^2}{[H_2][I_2]}$$ Can you find a relation between ##K_{c_1}## and ##K_{c_2}##?
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
I know the reaction reversed and doubled. But I don’t know how to solve for Kc mathematically with this set-up.
 
Madelin Pierce said:
But I don’t know how to solve for Kc mathematically with this set-up.
What maths are you referring to? If you can find ##K_{c_2}## in terms of ##K_{c_1}##, then can't you find ##K_{c_2}##?
 
Madelin Pierce said:
I know the reaction reversed and doubled. But I don’t know how to solve for Kc mathematically with this set-up.
What do you get if you square @Wrichik Basu's first equation, and then multiply it by his second equation.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top