Kepler's Law: Error Analysis & Mass of Earth

AI Thread Summary
A discussion on Kepler's Law highlights the significance of understanding the impact of errors in orbital parameters, specifically questioning whether a 10% error in the orbital period (p) or the semi-major axis (a) would yield a larger error. It is clarified that, according to Kepler's third law, a 10% error in period results in a greater overall error due to the squaring effect compared to the cubing effect of the semi-major axis. For calculating Earth's mass using the moon's orbital data, participants are guided to apply Kepler's third law formula, emphasizing the relationship between the period, semi-major axis, and mass. The formula M=4π²a³/(P²G) is provided for solving the mass of Earth. The discussion concludes with a reminder that Kepler's law indicates proportionality rather than equality between the period squared and the semi-major axis cubed.
swickey
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hello everyone,
I have a couple of questions from my astonomy course that are confusing me.
1. Which do you think would cause the larger error: a 10% error in "p" (period of orbit) or "a" (length of semi-major axis in units)? I would think that the "p" would produce the larger error, because it could alter the position of planet. Is that right?

2. The orbit of Earth's moon has a period of 27.3 days and a radius (semi-major axis) of 2.56 x 10^-3 A.U. (=3.84 x 10^5 km). What is the mass of Earth? What are the units? Show your work?


I'm not sure which formula to use, can anyone give me some pointers?
Thanks a bunch.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Both your questions involve Kepler's third law of planetary motion.

1) Kepler's third law states that the period squared is proportional to the semi-major axis cubed. If you take 10% of any value and square it, then take 10% of that same value and cube it, which number is bigger? For example, let's assume your arbitrary value is 100 (forget units). Ten percent of 100 is 10. Compare 10-squared to 10-cubed. Which is larger?

2) This is a simple "plug-and-chug" problem. Use the general equation of Kepler's third law (it should be in your textbook), plug in the numbers you are given and plug in the constants to solve for your one unknown value. The variables in the equation are the period p, the semi-major axis a, the mass of the moon m, and the mass of the Earth M. You can look up the values for the gravitational constant G and pi. Solve for M.
 
I see where you going...
P^2 = a ^3
Comparing 10-squared to 10-cubed. Cubed would be greater. Thanks

M=4pi^2a^3 / P^2G

Thanks a lot. It seems so simple now.
 
Just to note that Kepler didn't say the period squared and the semi-major axis cubed were equal. He said they were proportional.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top