Kinematic question from giancoli

  • Thread starter Thread starter nobelium102
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a kinematic problem involving a garden hose nozzle that shoots water vertically upward. The calculated initial water speed as it leaves the nozzle is 9.05 m/s, with the acceleration due to gravity consistently at -9.8 m/s² throughout the motion. Participants clarify that while the upward velocity decreases as the water rises, the acceleration remains constant and negative, indicating a steady deceleration. The confusion stems from the relationship between velocity and acceleration, with the latter not changing despite the water's upward and downward motion. Understanding this concept is crucial for solving similar kinematic problems effectively.
nobelium102
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose you adjust your garden hose nozzle for a hard stream of water. You point the nozzle vertically upward at a height of 1.5 m above the ground (the hose is 1.5 m off the ground). When you quickly move the nozzle from the vertical you hear the water striking the ground next to you for another 2.0 s. What is the water speed as it leaves the nozzle?

Homework Equations



?

The Attempt at a Solution



my attempt s = ut+1/2 at^2
-1.5 = u(2) + 1/2(-9.8)(4)
u = 9.05 m/s

and it is right
but the question is that why is the acceleration still -9.8m/s^2 when the water is going up and then falling down?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
why is the acceleration still -9.8m/s^2 when the water is going up and then falling down?
The acceleration is always downward so it is negative. It means the upward speed decreases steadily at a rate of 9.8 m/s every second. Initially the upward speed is 9.05 m/s. After 1 second, it is 9.05-9.81 = -.76 m/s. That is just after the maximum height where the speed is zero. After two seconds, the upward speed is -.76 - 9.81 = -10.57 m/s, which is the speed just before hitting the ground.
 
oh man i didn't understand at first but i think i kind of get it

you are saying that acceleration has decreased so much that it became negative direction?
right?
hope this is right
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top