Kinetic Energy-Mass conversion

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShamelessGit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinetic
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
ShamelessGit
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to learn relativity on my own by doing practice problems on the internet. One of the ones I'm having difficulty with is one where you have to calculate the threshold kinetic energy necessary to create an anti-proton by smashing two protons together. I think you assume that one proton is at rest and the other smashes it, and then all 3 protons and the anti-proton move together at the same speed after the collision. You have to create a proton as well as an anti-proton in order to conserve charge.


Homework Equations



Kinetic energy = √(mc^2/(1-(v/c)^2)) - mc^2
Momentum = mv/√(1-(v/c)^2)

Rest energy = mc^2

Energy and momentum conserved


The Attempt at a Solution



I figured that I'd try to solve it the same way I'd try to solve for an elastic collision in classical physics, which is by setting up the conservation of energy and conservation of momentum and then by solving the system of equations.

I get:

K1 + M1 = K2 + M2

P1 = P2

P stands for momentum, K stands for kinetic energy, and M stands for mass energy.

This is the second time I've tried to work it this way. The first time I actually tried to solve it algebraically, which is a mess, and I found that I had set up an inconsistent system when I finally had rearranged everything and substituted. I figured I must have just set up the equation wrong and I tried again a few days later (today), but I noticed that this question is a part of a test that students would have to take and it is only worth 1 point, which is the same amount of points given to much easier questions, such as a simple Doppler-shift calculation, or simply writing down the Lorentz transformations (without having to use them). So I'm thinking that there must be a much easier solution to this problem? Also, are the equations I wrote down correct? I haven't actually tried to substitute anything this time because I can see that it will be an awful problem and probably not what the instructor was looking for.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ShamelessGit said:

Homework Statement


I'm trying to learn relativity on my own by doing practice problems on the internet. One of the ones I'm having difficulty with is one where you have to calculate the threshold kinetic energy necessary to create an anti-proton by smashing two protons together. I think you assume that one proton is at rest and the other smashes it, and then all 3 protons and the anti-proton move together at the same speed after the collision. You have to create a proton as well as an anti-proton in order to conserve charge.


Homework Equations



Kinetic energy = √(mc^2/(1-(v/c)^2)) - mc^2
Momentum = mv/√(1-(v/c)^2)

Rest energy = mc^2

Energy and momentum conserved


The Attempt at a Solution



I figured that I'd try to solve it the same way I'd try to solve for an elastic collision in classical physics, which is by setting up the conservation of energy and conservation of momentum and then by solving the system of equations.

I get:

K1 + M1 = K2 + M2

P1 = P2

P stands for momentum, K stands for kinetic energy, and M stands for mass energy.

This is the second time I've tried to work it this way. The first time I actually tried to solve it algebraically, which is a mess, and I found that I had set up an inconsistent system when I finally had rearranged everything and substituted. I figured I must have just set up the equation wrong and I tried again a few days later (today), but I noticed that this question is a part of a test that students would have to take and it is only worth 1 point, which is the same amount of points given to much easier questions, such as a simple Doppler-shift calculation, or simply writing down the Lorentz transformations (without having to use them). So I'm thinking that there must be a much easier solution to this problem? Also, are the equations I wrote down correct? I haven't actually tried to substitute anything this time because I can see that it will be an awful problem and probably not what the instructor was looking for.

Such problems are almost always much easier if you go to the so-called "center of mass (CM) frame", in which the initial (and final) total momentum = 0. That is what physicists do: carry out the basics in the CM frame, then transform afterwards into other frames if needed.
 
You're right! That does make it so much easier! Thanks!