Kinetic energy of a free electron in a lattice

Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Show that for a simple square lattice (in 2-D) with the lattice spacing = a, the kinetic energy of a free electron at a corner (point A in the figure below) of the first Brillouin zone is higher than that of an electron at the midpoint of a side of the zone (point B in the figure below) by a factor of 2.
http://imageshack.com/a/img856/2000/zuci.jpg

Homework Equations



No clue


The Attempt at a Solution



So...like I have no clue about this...has anyone got a hint for me? I don't even know which equations to use...thanks guys...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess this is quantum mechanics applied to solid physics?
In QM, electrons can't be totally at rest, which gives some sense to the question ...
You need first to remember everything about what a Brillouin zone is!
Then you simply need to translate "corner" and "midpoint" to answer this question.

This question contains little very physical meaning.
It is more a check that you know what a Brillouin zone is.
Therefore, I also suggest you the question yourself about why this concept (Brillouin zone) emerged and what its utility is.
This might help you for the next questions, maybe?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top