Kinetic energy of relativistic electrons

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the energy required to manipulate electrons in a barium aluminate metal and their kinetic energy at relativistic speeds. It is established that removing a mole of electrons requires approximately 96,300 joules, and one gram of electrons equates to about 1,836 moles. The kinetic energy of electrons accelerated to 0.9 times the speed of light (c) is influenced by a gamma factor of 2.29, which increases their effective mass and kinetic energy. The LINAC's specifications are discussed, particularly its power output and efficiency, to determine the energy needed to accelerate the electrons to relativistic speeds. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexities of electron acceleration and energy calculations in high-energy physics.
neptunone
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Gentleman,

My questions are the following:

1.) If It takes 534 kJ to remove one mole of electrons from the atoms at the surface of a solid barium aluminate metal, how many kJ would it take to generate one gramm of electrons ?

2.) How much kinetic energy do one mole of electrons accelerated to relativistic speed (.9 c) have ?

3.) How much energy is required for the LINAC(1.1) to accelerate said mole of electrons to .9 c ?

Additional Info:

The LINAC consists of five Klystrons with the following characteristics:

C Band frequency Klystron E3783 –
Operating Frequency 2856 MHz
Peak Output Power 4.5 MW
Average Power 2.8 MW
Power efficiency 44 %
Gain (dB) 48 %
Pulse Length Duration 20 usec typical
Pulse Repetition 250 pps
Gun Voltage 130 KV
Beam Current 85 amps

Thank you for your help.

Sincerely

neptunone
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi neptunone! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(oh, and it's "Gentlemen" :wink:)

Show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
Using a work function of 1 eV per electron to pull it out of the cathode, it will take 96,300 joules to pull a mole of electrons out. So your barium titenate cathode must have a work function of 5.5 eV. The proton's mass is about 1 gram per mole, and the electron's mass is 1836 times less, so 1 gram of electrons is 1836 moles. 0.9 c equals a gamma of 2.29, so the total mass is 2.29 times as high, kinetic energy 1.29 times.
Is your 85 amps is the klystron beam current, and not the electron beam current? 2856 MHz is not very good for high electron beam current. (I used to work on a 2856 MHz Varian-built linac).
 
Dear tiny-tim, dear Gentlemen

Please forgive me for the typo. I would like to thank Bob S for his reply. That was very helpful.

0.9 c equals 2.29 gamma, the kinetic energy 1.29, so far so good.

That leaves the last question: How much energy is required for the LINAC (5 x 45 GeV, 4.5 MW each) to accelerate said mole of electrons to .9 c ?

Thank you very much for your time and patience.

Sincerely yours

neptunone
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top