Lab report help: calculating uncertainty

AI Thread Summary
When calculating uncertainties in a lab report, multiplying the uncertainties directly is not appropriate. Instead, uncertainties should be calculated using a computational method that involves determining the individual contributions of each variable's uncertainty. Specifically, for a quantity like work, the uncertainties from force and distance should be squared, summed, and then the square root taken to find the total uncertainty. Rounding the final result should align with the precision of the calculated uncertainty. Understanding this process is crucial for accurate reporting in scientific work.
theIBnerd
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a problem while writing the uncertainty of datas in my lab report (portfolio).
So, here is my question:

While multiplying some data with different uncertainties, I do multiply their uncertainties too, right?

Then, if the multiplication of uncertainities has less digits after comma than that of the actual multiplication af data; should I round up some digits of the actual multiplication of data?

Homework Equations


To make it more clear, here is an example:

Work= Force x distance
W(J)= m(kg) ±0.1 kg x g(m/sec2) ±0.1 m/sec2 x h(m) ±0.01 m
W= 47.9 kg x 9.79 m/sec2 x 3.975 m
W= 1864.040475 kg x m2/sec2= 1864.040475 Joule ±0.0001 Joule

The Attempt at a Solution



Should it be like:
W= 1864.0405 Joule ±0.0001 Joule ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When multiplying terms with calculated uncertainties, you cannot multiply the uncertainties themselves. Unless you're given an error equation, one of the best ways to go about finding the uncertainty for a quantity (such as work) is to use the computational method.

If you're trying to calculate work for example, and you have uncertainties in force and distance, you want to find the uncertainty in the work caused by the uncertainty in the force \delta_{W,F}, as well as the uncertainty in the work cause by the uncertainty in the distance \delta_{W,d}.. Once you obtain these quantities, you can square them, add them together and take the square root to obtain the uncertainty in the work. It would be a little lengthy to describe the entire computational method, so I would suggest researching it online. I hope that helps.
 
First of all, thanks a lot! It really helped. My physics teacher does not give us these "details" (which I don't think so); I believe he expects us to suddenly come up with the idea of this process for uncertainties. Thank you anyway.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top