Lagrange multipliers in a simple pendulum

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


Not really a homework question, just want to check out if what I'm doing is right. I challenged myself to find the equation of motion and the forces in the simple pendulum system but with using the Lagrange multipliers and the constraint equation.

Homework Equations


In next part.

The Attempt at a Solution


Let l be the length of the pendulum. I use polar coordinates and set my system of reference in the place where the mass is when at rest. The constraint equation is, I believe, l=\text{constant}=C.
I write a modified Lagrangian which takes into account the constraint equation and the Lagrange multiplier. \tilde L =L-\lambda _ l (l-C).
The kinetic energy of the system is T=\frac{m\dot \theta ^2 l^2}{2} while the potential energy is V=l-l\cos \theta.
So that \tilde L=\frac{m\dot \theta ^2 l^2}{2}-(l-l\cos \theta)-\lambda _ l (l-C). I have thus 3 "generalized coordinates", \lambda _l which should be worth the force of constraint, theta and l.
Euler-Lagrange equations yield l=C when considering \lambda_l as generalized coordinate, \theta ^2 +\frac{g}{l}\sin \theta =0 where I had to consider that l=C so that \dot l=0 (that was when considering theta as generalized coordinate) and finally for l they yield \lambda _l=m \dot \theta ^2 l -mg (1+\cos \theta ) which has units of Newton. So I am guessing this is the tension force or something like that, I am not really sure. This is a generalized force but I'm not sure with respect to what generalized coordinate. Any explanation is appreciated.
I wonder if all I did is ok. Could someone clarify things up? Thank you!
However I do not know how to get the generalized force, \lambda _l.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I tried considering l as the generalized coordinate and setting \theta =\theta _0 with \dot \theta =0 so that it simplifies to \lambda _l = mg (1+\cos \theta _0 ) which is a constant value. Is this alright?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top