Is Angular Momentum Conserved in a Vertical Plane with Additional Force?

pandagoat
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a vertical plane in a constant gravitational field. Let the origin of a coordinate system be located at some point in this plane. A particle of mass m moves in the vertical plane under the influence of gravity and under the influence of an aditional force f = -Ar^(a-1) directed toward the origin (r is the distance from the origin; A and a [does not = 0 or 1] are constants). Choose appropriate generalized coordinates, and find the Langrangian equations of motion. Is the angular momentum about thet origin conserved?

Homework Equations


L = T - U
\frac{\partial L}{\partial q_i} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q_i} = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


Choose the coordinate system (r', y') centered at the origin, so that the r' axis is in the direction of the origin to the particle of mass m and the y' axis is perpendicular to r'.

First, \arrow F = (-mg\cos{\theta}, -mg\sin{\theta}) + (-Ar^{a-1}, 0) = (-mg\cos{\theta} - Ar^{a-1}, -mg\sin{\theta}).

From here we can guess the potential:
U = mgr\cos{\theta} + \frac{A}{a}r^a + mgy\sin{\theta}.

(The preceding steps may be wrong, but the following is what I'm not sure about):
Notice that in our coordinate system y is always 0. So our potential is U = mgr\cos{\theta} + \frac{A}{a}r^a. For the kinetic energy, we get T = 1/2m(\dot r^2 + \dot \theta^2r^2) <ACCIDENT = 1/2m\dot \theta^2r^2>. So our Langrangian is L = 1/2m(\dot r^2 + \dot \theta^2r^2) - mgr\cos{\theta} - \frac{A}{a}r^a.

The rest is easy if I did the preceding correctly. You get that angular momentum is not conserved when you find \frac{\partial L}{\partial \theta} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot \theta} = 0.

Thanks in advanced!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks OK. You should get two equations of motion. What does this mean? Are you saying r-dot is zero?

<br /> T = 1/2m(\dot r^2 + \dot \theta^2r^2) = 1/2m\dot \theta^2r^2<br />
 
Last edited:
That was an accident. In the Lagrangian, you can see I did not carry that part through. I will put the incorrect part in brackets. Thank you! My confidence in this material has been elevated.
 
Last edited:
Just checking. Lagrangians are fun once you get used to them.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top