What Energy Level is Needed for a Laser to Ignite Air Like Lightning?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Intuitive
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laser
AI Thread Summary
A tuned laser would need to match the binding energy of nitrogen (N2) and oxygen (O2) molecules to ionize them, similar to how lightning interacts with air. Lightning does not ignite air but ionizes these gases, leading to the formation of nitrogen oxides (NOx) through recombination. The discussion highlights the need for potentially two lasers of different frequencies and sufficient intensity to achieve this ionization. A proposed concept involves using a laser in a reflective pipe to intensify the beam, although concerns exist about whether a low-power laser can achieve the desired reaction with air. The energy requirements for this process depend on the number of air molecules dissociated and the specific pulse shape of the laser.
Intuitive
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Question.


If we had a tuned LASER, at what level of Energy would be required for a tuned LASER beam to spontaneously ignite the Air around its Beam just as a Bolt of Lightning ignites the Air around itself.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Intuitive said:
If we had a tuned LASER, at what level of Energy would be required for a tuned LASER beam to spontaneously ignite the Air around its Beam just as a Bolt of Lightning ignites the Air around itself.
A bolt of lightning does not ignite the air! A bolt of lightning ionizes the N2 and O2 molecules and atoms, and the recombination results in the formation of some NOx. The frequency of a laser would have to match the binding energy of N2 and/or O2, and perhaps one would need two lasers of different frequencies, and the intensity would determine the amount of molecules ionized.
 
Astronuc said:
A bolt of lightning does not ignite the air! A bolt of lightning ionizes the N2 and O2 molecules and atoms, and the recombination results in the formation of some NOx. The frequency of a laser would have to match the binding energy of N2 and/or O2, and perhaps one would need two lasers of different frequencies, and the intensity would determine the amount of molecules ionized.

My Apologies Astronuc.

I used the word ignite because of the process

When exposed to oxygen, NO is converted into NO2. This conversion has been speculated as occurring via the ONOONO intermediate. In water, NO will react with oxygen and water to form HNO2. The reaction is thought to proceed via the following stoichiometry:

4 NO + O2 + 2 H2O → 4 HNO2

Which to me the entire process of ionizing the N2 and O2 to form NO and the rest of the chemical reaction to be a form of ignited cumbustion, I was taught that Lightning ignites the Air and that's where I used the term.

And thanks again for the useful information on the LASER.

I am working on a concept that uses a LASER that will emit through a highly reflective pipe that has an Inside diameter(ID) the same diameter as the LASER Beams width, The objective is to intensify the LASER Beam so that Air inside the Pipe evacuates by reaction although I don't believe a low power LASER can do the job even if properly tuned, That's why I wanted to know about the power level required to react with Air.

I wished to take this further for my own Linear LASER particle accelerator on a small scale.
 
Intuitive said:
When exposed to oxygen, NO is converted into NO2. This conversion has been speculated as occurring via the ONOONO intermediate. In water, NO will react with oxygen and water to form HNO2. The reaction is thought to proceed via the following stoichiometry:

4 NO + O2 + 2 H2O → 4 HNO2

Which to me the entire process of ionizing the N2 and O2 to form NO and the rest of the chemical reaction to be a form of ignited cumbustion, I was taught that Lightning ignites the Air and that's where I used the term.

I am working on a concept that uses a LASER that will emit through a highly reflective pipe that has an Inside diameter(ID) the same diameter as the LASER Beams width, The objective is to intensify the LASER Beam so that Air inside the Pipe evacuates by reaction although I don't believe a low power LASER can do the job even if properly tuned, That's why I wanted to know about the power level required to react with Air.

I wished to take this further for my own Linear LASER particle accelerator on a small scale.
Interesting - a related concept was envisioned during the development of SDI (Star Wars).

In a pipe, I don't believe a significant vacuum would be achieved based on 4 NO + O2 + 2 H2O → 4 HNO2. The reduction in molecules from 7 to 4 would produce a reduction in pressure, but only upon cooling. During the laser pulse, with the dissociation, one would achieve a transient increase in pressure. Remember that the sound of thunder is due to a pressure wave expanding outward from the lightning bolt.

To determine the energy requirements, one needs to look at the number of moles of air (N2 and O2) that would have to be dissociated in the path (column) of the laser, and determine the energy and determine the pulse shape in order to determine the power.

E\,=\,\int\,P(t)\,dt
 
Thread 'I need a concave mirror with a focal length length of 150 feet'
I need to cut down a 3 year old dead tree from top down so tree causes no damage with small pieces falling. I need a mirror with a focal length of 150 ft. 12" diameter to 36" diameter will work good but I can't think of any easy way to build it. Nothing like this for sale on Ebay. I have a 30" Fresnel lens that I use to burn stumps it works great. Tree service wants $2000.
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Thread 'Where is my curb stop?'
My water meter is submerged under water for about 95% of the year. Today I took a photograph of the inside of my water meter box because today is one of the rare days that my water meter is not submerged in water. Here is the photograph that I took of my water meter with the cover on: Here is a photograph I took of my water meter with the cover off: I edited the photograph to draw a red circle around a knob on my water meter. Is that knob that I drew a red circle around my meter...
Back
Top