Length of the rope around two circles

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the shortest length of rope that can be wrapped around two circles with given diameters. The problem involves geometric concepts and potentially trigonometric reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the geometric configuration of the rope, discussing the segments involved, including circular arcs and straight lines. There is mention of using right triangles and trigonometry to find points of tangency. Some participants question the validity of combining diameters or radii to find the rope length, suggesting that a straight line might be a shorter alternative.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various perspectives on how to approach the problem, with some participants providing algebraic formulations and others expressing uncertainty about the methods. There is no explicit consensus, but several lines of reasoning are being explored, including geometric and algebraic approaches.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that one individual involved in the discussion may not have a background in trigonometry, which could affect the explanation of concepts related to the problem.

sssddd
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
http://www.olemiss.edu/mathed/geometry/tight.gif

To determine the shortest rope that can be wrapped around the two circles

any ideas? i have forgotten everything about geometry. My nephew asked me this
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you basically have four segments: two circular arcs and two straight lines. The problem is that you have to find where exactly the rope is tangent to the circles (aka where the straight lines turn into circular arcs) To find that point it looks like you can strategically place some right triangles and use trigonometry to solve it.
 
It's been a while but I am almost positive that you just combine the diameters or radii and just use the circumference formula c = pi*d = 2pi*r

So, the shortest length of rope that can we wound around two circles of diameters 6ft and 18ft is pi*(6+18) = 24pi ft.
 
mepcotterell said:
It's been a while but I am almost positive that you just combine the diameters or radii and just use the circumference formula c = pi*d = 2pi*r

So, the shortest length of rope that can we wound around two circles of diameters 6ft and 18ft is pi*(6+18) = 24pi ft.

You do understand that "a straight line is the shortes distance between two points" don't you? Your solution, wrapping the rope around the two circles, has the rope going from the point of tangency ln one circle, around the circle to the point of contact, then around the other circle to the point of tangency on the other circle. That is much longer than just the straight line from one point of tangency to the other!
In this case "almost positive" isn't good enough.
 
You are absolutley right HallsofIvy. I apologize. I was more than a little dazed and confused when I made my original reply to the thread.
 
if i do use triangles, what length do i use, the radii and what else, i am almost there.

and my nephew hasnt taken trig yet, not sure if i can be any of help if i explain to him.
 
Last edited:
Well, you might use an algebraic approach; I'll help you along a bit:

Let the radii be r and R, respectively.

Let the r-circle have centre at (0,0), the R-circle at (R+r,0)
Thus, the two circles have the representations:
[tex]x^{2}+y^{2}=r^{2}, (x-(r+R))^{2}+y^{2}=R^{2}[/tex]
Let a point of tangency at the r-circle be denoted as [itex](x_{0},y_{0})[/itex]
(Note that the x-value of the tangency points on the r-circle will be unique, whereas there must be two y-values).

The unit tangent at [itex](x_{0},y_{0})[/itex] in the direction of the other circle is [itex]\vec{T}=(\frac{y_{0}}{r},-\frac{x_{0}}{r})[/itex], and we may parametrize its tangent line as:
[tex]\vec{L}(t)=(x_{0},y_{0})+t\vec{T}[/tex]

Now, put this expression into the equation for the R-circle:
[tex](x_{0}+\frac{y_{0}t}{r}-(r+R))^{2}+(y_{0}-\frac{x_{0}t}{r})^{2}=R^{2}[/tex]
Or, we may rewrite to:
[tex]t^{2}-\frac{2y_{0}(r+R)}{r}t+2(r-x_{0})(r+R)=0[/tex]
which is a second degree equation in t, as expressed with the other variables!

Now, note that if [itex]\vec{L}[/itex] is also tangent to some point on the R-circle, such a point will be the ONLY point on the R-circle coinciding with [itex]\vec{L}[/itex]
If [itex]\vec{L}[/itex] is NOT a tangent line to the R-circle, it will either intersect this circle twice, or not at all.

Thus, if we require that the discriminant of the second-degree equation is zero, then we know that the t-value thus gained gets us the point of tangency on the R-circle.
The requirement that the discriminant be zero, furnish us with the last equation in order to determine [itex](x_{0},y_{0})[/itex] in terms of r and R (the other being the trivial requirement that the point lies on the r-circle.


Hope this helps. :smile:

EDIT:
In the above, I have of course ignored that the two circles have a common tangent line also for their point of contact. You'll find this solution as well when going through the calculations.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
7K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K