Lifting of submerged pipe, ventilation area calculation

AI Thread Summary
A submerged pipe is being lifted at a constant speed of 1m/min, requiring a ventilation hole at the top to minimize water height difference. The user calculated a pressure of 5042.3 N/m² based on a 0.5m water height and used an online calculator to determine that a 50mm diameter vent hole would suffice. There is confirmation that the approach to calculating the vent hole area is generally correct, with suggestions to implement the formulas in a spreadsheet for self-calculation. Concerns were raised about whether the entire water height difference contributes to pressure, considering potential friction forces within the pipe. The context relates to the removal of a deep-sea oil drilling rig.
Willem_lift
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

This is the situation: a pipe, shown in de drawing below, is lifted at a constant speed of 1m/min. The pipe is closed at the top and open at the bottom. For obvious reasons, a ventilation hole is required at the top. The intention is to lift a minimum amount of water, in other words, the height difference of the water inside the pipe and the sea level should be minimal.

Some more info:
-pipe diameter at top: 1.3 meter
-pipe diameter at bottom: 2.6 meter

I tried some things to calculate the required vent hole area, but I'm not sure if I did it right at all. Hope you can help me!

This is how I did it:

I determined that an height difference of 0.5 m was allowable. 0.5 m of water results in a pressure of P = 0.5*g*rho_saltwater = 0.5*9.81*1028 = 5042.3 N/m^2

Then I used an online calculator:

http://www.tlv.com/global/TI/calculator/air-flow-rate-through-orifice.html

And filled in the following variables:
-Air temperature: 10 degrees Celsius
-Primary pressure: 5042.34 Pa
-Secondary pressure: 0 Pa

For the volumetric flow I used the most unfavorable situation, which is when the pipe is almost out of the water. At that point the largest amount of water leaves the pipe.

Q = r^2*pi*lifting_speed = (2.6/2)^2 * 3.14 * 1 = 5.3 m^3/min

Then iterate the tool till you find an appropriate vent hole area. I found that an hole with a diameter of 50mm would do the job.

Is this in any way correct? And I would like to be able to calculate it myself, instead of using a tool. Anybody know how to?

Thanks in advance!

Pipe lift drawing.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have not checked your arithmetic. But it looks like basically the right way to approach things. A hole size 50 mm in diameter does not seem outrageous.

If you want to calculate the air flow for yourself, the calculator page you cited gives the formulas. It looks simple enough to implement as a spreadsheet function. You could then do various things to get your answer.

Is this something to do with deep-sea oil well drilling?
 
Thanks for your reply. Good to hear that the calculator is the right approach.

The reason I doubted it, was that I wasn't sure if it was ok to assume al the water height difference would result into a pressure difference. I thought that maybe a significant amount of the pressure would be needed to overcome any friction forces with the water and the inside of the pipe.

And yes, it has something to do with deep-sea oil well drilling! The removal of a drilling rig to be precise.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top