Limiting case for an angle in an equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xsnac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
Xsnac
Messages
32
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


7691_F9_E4254_AB9929_EB8_EFE7135_F1_BF765_F8820_D71_ABADB.jpg


Homework Equations


The one in the middle with cot (big tetha)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no ideea how he finds the limiting cases for V<v0; v0<V and for V> v0/sqrt (1-v0^2) .
The problem is from Landau course for theoretical physics, volume 2: The Classical Theory of Fields. page 35.
I have been struggling with this problem for quite some time but made no real progress. Any bit of advice or even a full derivation step by step would be much appreciated. Is not a homework in the real sense btw. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the independent variable for finding the extrema of
upload_2016-11-4_14-22-13.png

?
 
  • Like
Likes Xsnac
TSny said:
What is the independent variable for finding the extrema of
View attachment 108463
?

I would say the independent variable is tetha_0 since for each case we set V and V0 constant.
 
Xsnac said:
I would say the independent variable is tetha_0 since for each case we set V and V0 constant
Yes. Did you try finding the extrema of the right-hand side of the cotΘ expression?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top