Linear Algebra - Dimension, Basis

AI Thread Summary
In linear algebra, if a set of vectors W has more elements than a linearly independent set V, then W must be linearly dependent. This is because the additional vectors in W can only be expressed as linear combinations of the vectors in V, which already span the space defined by V. Since V has dimension n, any set with more than n vectors cannot be independent. Thus, W cannot maintain linear independence if m > n. The conclusion is that W is indeed linearly dependent.
discoverer02
Messages
138
Reaction score
1
Linear Algebra -- Dimension, Basis

Had a horrible lecture this morning and the following was presented at a lightning quick pace. I'm not sure whether I messed up my notes in my haste to get them all down or if I'm completely not understanding something.

I have two sets of vectors: W = {w1,w2,w3,...,wm} and V = {v1,v2,...,vn} V is linearly independent.
If the elements of W are linear combinations of the elements in V and there are more elements in W than V, m>n, W is linearly dependent or independent?

I wrote down W is linearly independent, but I'm thinking this is wrong.

Clarification would be VERY GREATLY APPRECIATED.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Linearly independent means that the vectors do not depend on each other.

Let's say that the first n vectors in W are constant multiples of the first n vectors in V, i.e.

w_n = a_n v_n

Soyou'll agree that W will be linearly independent if it comprised only the n vectors, as V is. In fact, you'll probably agree that W is almost identical to V except in scaling.

Except now we have extra vectors in W, which are linear combinations of the vectors in V. We've run out of independent vectors in V, so we have to start adding two or more V vectors together to get a vector in W, i.e.

w_m = b^nv_n
for m>n

So the question is, are the extra vectors in W independent of the first n vectors in W? Clearly, they cannot be, since all of the linearly independent vectors have already been used!

Therefore, W is not linearly independent.

cookiemonster
 
Since V is linearly independent, its "span" (the set of a linear combinations of vectors in V) is a subspace- a vector space in its own right- which has dimension n. A set of vectors, such as W, in that space with more than n members CANNOT be independent. W is dependent.
 
Thanks very much for the help. I can now try to make sense of the rest of my notes and hopefully sleep soundly tonight.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top