Linear Algebra Matrix Transformation to plane

FlorenceC
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Find the matrix for the transformation that projects each point in R3 (3-D) perpendicularly onto the plane 7x + y + 3z = 0 .

The attempt at a solution is attached for question 1 (actually instructor's solution)

I kind of understand it but ...
why is n <dot> v = equation of the plane?
Does v represent all of the possible points of R^3 (certainly does not seem so...) which is projected to the normal?
I understand the v-projection is there to get the projection of v onto the plane because we cannot directly project to the plane right? But why do we want v' what does v' represent and how is that the solution?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-10-27 at 1.29.15 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-10-27 at 1.29.15 AM.png
    64.8 KB · Views: 767
  • Screen Shot 2014-10-27 at 1.29.27 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-10-27 at 1.29.27 AM.png
    47.3 KB · Views: 690
  • Screen Shot 2014-10-27 at 1.29.32 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-10-27 at 1.29.32 AM.png
    34.6 KB · Views: 682
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no solution attached. I moved this post from the Homework & Coursework section because it is less about how to do the problem than it is about general questions about vectors and projections onto vectors.
 
##\vec n \cdot \vec v = \|\vec n\| \|\vec v\| \cos \theta ##.
In short, if ##\vec n## is a unit vector, in your example ##\frac {\vec n}{\| \vec n \|}##, you can draw the right triangle with v as the hypotenuse and n the adjacent leg with theta the angle between them.
This is why the dot product is used for projections, but the result is just a length (scalar). When you are projecting onto the normal vector, you have to multiply the length you found for that projection by the unit normal.
This is not on the plane, but the part of ##\vec v## that is normal to the plane.
If you subtract that piece off of the original vector, what is leftover is the part of the vector that lies in the plane. That is what you are calling v'.
Using this method, v is any vector pointing to any x,y,z in ##\mathbb{R}^3##.
 
FlorenceC said:
Find the matrix for the transformation that projects each point in R3 (3-D) perpendicularly onto the plane 7x + y + 3z = 0 .

The attempt at a solution is attached for question 1 (actually instructor's solution)

I kind of understand it but ...
why is n <dot> v = equation of the plane?
It isn't. But I think what you meant to say is that "the equation of the plane is n dot v= 0." where n is the normal to the plane and v is the "position vector" of a point in the plane. Also, this only applies to the case of a plane that contains the origin- the only kind of plane that is a "subspace". Since the plane contains the origin, the "position vector" of a point in the plane lies in the plane itself. Since "v" is normal to the plane, it is perpendicular to every vector in the plane. In particular, n is perpendicular to vector v so their dot product is 0.

Does v represent all of the possible points of R^3 (certainly does not seem so...) which is projected to the normal?
No, v represents (is the position vector of) all points in the plane.

I understand the v-projection is there to get the projection of v onto the plane because we cannot directly project to the plane right? But why do we want v' what does v' represent and how is that the solution?

kind of understand it but ...
why is n <dot> v = equation of the plane?
Does v represent all of the possible points of R^3 (certainly does not seem so...) which is projected to the normal?
I understand the v-projection is there to get the projection of v onto the plane because we cannot directly project to the plane right? But why do we want v' what does v' represent and how is that the solution?
 
Remember that any vector can be written as the sum of two (or more) orthogonal vectors. In this example, you are breaking ##\vec v## into two parts, one perpendicalar to the plane (i.e. parallel to the normal) and the projection ##\vec v'## that lies in the plane.
##\vec v = (\vec v \cdot \hat n) \hat n + \vec v'## where ##\hat n = \frac {\vec n }{\| \vec n \|} ##.
Solving for the projection into the plane gives you the equation
##\vec v'=\vec v-(\vec v \cdot \hat n) \hat n##.
FlorenceC said:
I understand the v-projection is there to get the projection of v onto the plane because we cannot directly project to the plane right?
If you wanted to project directly only the plane, you would first need to find the basis vectors for the plane.
A simple example is if you have a vector ##\vec M = a\hat x + b\hat y + c\hat z \in \mathbb{R}^3 ## and you wanted to project onto the x,y plane. The standard basis vectors for the x,y plane are ##\hat x, \hat y##.
You could project ##\vec M## onto the basis vectors one at a time and sum them, i.e.:
##(\vec M \cdot \hat x )\hat x = a \hat x ##
##(\vec M \cdot \hat y )\hat y = b \hat y ##
##\vec M ' = a \hat x + b \hat y ##
Or you could notice that ##\hat z ## is normal to the x,y plane. In fact, the x,y plane is defined in ##\mathbb{R}^3## by ##z=0##.
Then using the method above, simply subtract off the part of ##\vec M ## which is normal to the plane and the result will be the projection into the plane.
##(\vec M \cdot \hat z )\hat z = c \hat z ##
##\vec M ' = \vec M -(\vec M \cdot \hat z )\hat z = a \hat x + b \hat y ##.
Both methods get you to the same answer, but when you are given the normal vector, it should be clear which approach is more efficient.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top