Linear and Angular momentum of a rolling object

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a cylinder on a moving sheet of sandpaper, focusing on the relationship between linear and angular momentum. Initially, there is confusion about how the cylinder can roll clockwise while moving left, seemingly creating a contradiction. The clarification reveals that the cylinder can indeed move left at a slower velocity than the sandpaper, allowing for clockwise rotation without contradiction. The key point is that rolling requires the surface velocity to match that of the sandpaper, enabling the cylinder's motion. Understanding this interaction resolves the initial confusion regarding the motion dynamics.
hihiip201
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
Hi all:


I have been wondering:

picture a cylinder sitting above a sheet of sand paper, assume static friction between the sheet of paper and the cylinder.



if i start pulling the sheet of paper at velocity v along a direction of rolling (to the left), the moment caused by static friction of the sheet would cause a moment in clockwise direction, causing the a angular momentum C.W. But at the same time, since this force is directed in the left, there should be a linear momentum cause the this cylinder to roll to the left.


so my question is , wouldn't this imply a contradiction?
since if the cylinder is to roll to the left, there should be a C.C.W rotation?


thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hihiip201 said:
even for static friction?
Since the linear and angular acceleration can't be infinite, then in the case of only static friction, the sand paper (or the conveyor belt in the linked thread), would have to start off at zero velocity and then accelerate to some specific speed.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hi:Sorry about my stupidity, I just realize that you can have the cylinder moving to the left with velocity lower than v, and rolling to the right, i thought it implied a contradiction because i forgot that we are on a moving sandpaper, not stationary. I didn't see realize that rolling only means that surface velocity must be the same as the sandpaper and the object must move to the right relative to the sand paper, so as long as it doesn't move as fast as v this would be satisfied.thanks!
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top