Linear momentum or Angular Rotation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between linear momentum and angular rotation in a collision involving a cylinder. Participants agree that conservation of linear momentum is sufficient to determine the velocity of the cylinder's center of mass, expressed as V_cm = (m/M)v. Concerns are raised about the potential for the cylinder to rotate due to the collision, leading to a deeper analysis involving angular momentum and the relationship between the masses. The conclusion emphasizes that while the center of mass will accelerate due to the net force during the collision, it is incorrect to assume its velocity is zero. Overall, the analysis highlights the importance of considering both linear and angular momentum in collision problems.
Manasan3010
Messages
38
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
A cylinder with mass M and length L is rested on a frictionless surface. A particle with mass m and velocity V comes to rest after an elastic collision with one end of the cylinder. What is the velocity of Center of Gravity of cylinder after collision?
Relevant Equations
-
1565277810080.png

I think the answer is ##\frac{mV}{M}## but I am not sure. Won't the cylinder tries to rotate due to the collision at one end? Is this anything related to Angular Momentum?

The Answers given were,
1565278050355.png
 
  • Like
Likes haruspex
Physics news on Phys.org
Manasan3010 said:
I think the answer is ##\frac{mV}{M}## but I am not sure.
Looks good to me. All you care about is the velocity of the cylinder's center of mass, so conservation of linear momentum is all you need.
Manasan3010 said:
Won't the cylinder tries to rotate due to the collision at one end?
Sure, but who cares?
 
Doc Al said:
Sure, but who cares?
I think one ought to care enough to investigate the issue. I agree that linear momentum conservation yields the answer ##V_{cm}=\dfrac{m}{M}v##. However, how do we know that the problem is not over-determined if one considers the other conservation laws? After all, assuming that the masses are given, after finding ##V_{cm}## there is only one quantity to be determined, the angular speed of the rod, and two conservation equations. Hmm, let's see ...
From angular momentum conservation about the midpoint of the rod
$$mv\frac{L}{2}=\frac{1}{12}mL^2\omega\rightarrow \omega=\frac{v}{L}\left( \frac{6m}{M}\right)$$
From kinetic energy conservation and using the value for ##V_{cm}## found above
$$\frac{1}{2}mv^2=\frac{1}{2}M \left( \frac{m}{M}v\right)^2+\frac{1}{2}\times\frac{1}{12}ML^2\omega^2~\rightarrow~\omega=\frac{v}{L}\sqrt{ \frac{12m(M-m)}{M^2} }$$It follows that the two expressions for ##\omega## are compatible only if ##M=4m##. Thus, any future author who rewrites this problem giving specific values for the masses must ensure that the rod is 4 times more massive than the particle to make the solution work. Because the five choices given in this particular question all involve ##M## and ##m## as presumably independent quantities, I am led to believe that the author of this question did not take the constraint on the masses into account. It would have been better to provide the five choices as numerical factors multiplying ##v,## the correct answer being ##\frac{1}{4}v##.
 
  • Like
Likes Manasan3010 and Doc Al
Logically, Won't the center of gravity(Geometrical center) stay still and the ends would rotate (Like in a fan). If this the case, shouldn't the answer be 0 velocity because of it being in the center?

Q5ZC.gif

(Zero motion at the center of fan)
 
Manasan3010 said:
Logically, Won't the center of gravity(Geometrical center) stay still and the ends would rotate (Like in a fan). If this the case, shouldn't the answer be 0 velocity because of it being in the center?
No, that won't happen. Realize that there is a net force acting on the cylinder during the collision, thus the center of mass will accelerate. (Newton's 2nd law.)

The analysis by @kuruman is well worth your study and places interesting constraints on the relationship between the masses. However, such an analysis is not needed to solve the problem: conservation of linear momentum is enough. (If the author of the problem were on the ball, like @kuruman, he could have asked some interesting followup questions! I suspect he didn't do the analysis.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes kuruman
Manasan3010 said:
Logically, Won't the center of gravity(Geometrical center) stay still and the ends would rotate (Like in a fan). If this the case, shouldn't the answer be 0 velocity because of it being in the center?
Logically, no. In addition to what @Doc Al already pointed out in #5, in post #1 you calculated, and we all agreed, that the speed of the CM after the collision is ##V_{cm}=\dfrac{m}{M}v ##. To suggest now that it is zero is illogical. Of course, ##V_{cm}=0## in an inertial reference frame moving to the right with velocity ##u=\dfrac{m}{M}v ## relative to the lab frame, but the problem (and the offered choices) are relative to the lab frame where the particle is initially moving with speed ##v## to the right and is at rest after the collision.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top