Linear Thermal Expansion: Bridge Joints

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses a problem involving linear thermal expansion in a bridge made of concrete segments. The original temperature increase is given as 50 degrees Fahrenheit, which is converted to approximately 27.78 degrees Celsius for the calculation of expansion. The linear expansion formula is applied, leading to a calculated expansion of 2.6667 cm, which differs from the initial incorrect calculation of 0.96 cm. The misunderstanding stemmed from incorrectly interpreting the temperature change in Celsius. Correcting the temperature difference leads to the accurate spacing needed for the bridge joints.
Warden619
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
SOLVED

Homework Statement



A bridge is made with segments of concrete 80 m long (at the original temperature).
If the linear expansion coefficient is 1.2 x 10^-5 (1/degrees C), how much spacing is
needed to allow for expansion for an increase in temperature of 50 degrees F? Answer in units of cm.

Homework Equations



\DeltaL = \alpha L(0) \DeltaT

Degrees F = [(9/5) x Degrees C] + 32

The Attempt at a Solution



This should be so simple...
Degrees in C is simply (50-32) / (9/5) = 10 degrees C (This is delta T)
Convert 80 meters to 8000 cm.

So just plug and chug...

\DeltaL = (1.2 x 10^-5) (8000) (10)
= 0.96 cm

If the bridge is composed of two segments, then each one will expand 0.96, so you would need 1.92 cm of space according to my work.

But the solutions manual says the answer is 2.6667 cm. This has been driving me up the wall, any assistance would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Warden619, welcome to PF. 50°F absolute is 10°C absolute, but a difference of 50°F is not a difference of 10°C. Know what I mean?
 
So then the actual change in temperature is simply 50 / (9/5) = 27.777. We just throw out the 32 from the formula. Thank you very much, I knew it had to be something simple I was missing.
 
My pleasure.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top