Linearity of Partial Differential Equations

BustedBreaks
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Is this linear homogeneous, linear inhomogeneous etc...
u_{t}-u_{xx}+xu=0

From that first one I get this
\frac{u_{t}-u_{xx}}{u}=-x
which I'm not sure is linear.

Edit:
Similar questions involve the following equations:
iu_{t}-u_{xx}+\frac{u}{x}=0

and

u_{x}+e^{y}u_{y}=0

Another Edit:

I think I see the answer. I can rewrite the first equation like this:
(u_{t}-u_{xx}+xu)(\frac{1}{x})=0(\frac{1}{x})

and get a linear equation:

\frac{u_{t}}{x}-\frac{u_{xx}}{x}+u=0
UGH... Another Edit..

I'm not sure which approach is correct, the first or the second...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What makes such an equation linear is the fact that it is linear in the dependent variable u. That means u and its derivatives appear to the first degree. No u2 or uux and the like.

More specifically, if your differential operator is denoted L(u), it has the property that:

L(u + v) = L(u) + L(v) and L(cu) = cL(u) for constant c.

For example, given the equation

c(x,y)uxx+ f(x,y)u + g(x,y)uyy = h(x,y)

if you call L(u) = c(x,y)uxx+ f(x,y)u + g(x,y)uyy the equation becomes:

L(u) = h(x,y)

If you try the above two conditions on L, you will see that it satisfies them because of the linearity of taking derivatives. It wouldn't if it had terms like u2, sin(u) etc.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top