Load analysis on a motorcross bike - need some advice

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the strength of a motocross bike frame under various load conditions, particularly from vertical falls. The calculations involve modeling the bike's suspension using spring constants for the front and rear springs, leading to derived impact forces based on different fall heights. Participants emphasize the importance of considering damping in shock absorbers, as it significantly affects suspension performance during landings. There is also a debate about the accuracy of the spring constants used, with suggestions that they may be closer than initially thought. Overall, the project is seen as an engaging challenge, with participants providing resources for further research.
DanielSu
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
My task is to analyze a frame's strength of a specific motorcross using different loads, and to do this i decided to focus on vertical fall from various heights, since this will probably give the largest forces on the bike. The one can also experiment with different types of landings, i.e. landing on both wheels, backwheel etc.

So i reduced the problem and replaced the motorcross with a weight mg which is being supported by two springs which are parallel, so i can replace them with one spring constant k = k_rear + k_front.

Now let's go into the mechanics of the problem.
Lets say i have an unloaded spring with stiffness k and a weight mg over it. The weight is barely touching the top of the spring, such that the spring doesn't support it. I then release the weight and i want to find out what the impact load will be. So i reasoned that the potential energy must equal the energy of the spring according to
\frac{1}{2}kh_0^2 = mgh_0
or:
h_0 = 2\frac{mg}{k}

If i instead drop the weight from an additional height h above the unloaded spring, i get:
\frac{1}{2}kx^2 = mg\left(h+h_0\right)
or:
x = \sqrt{2\frac{mg}{k}\left(h+h_0\right)} = \sqrt{2\frac{mg}{k}\left(h+2\frac{mg}{k}\right)}
And the impact force would be:
F_i = kx = \sqrt{2kmg\left(h+2\frac{mg}{k}\right)} = \sqrt{2kmgh+4(mg)^2}
From here one can see that the stiffer the spring is, the stronger impact force one will get which seems logical.
Example:
k = 226 kN/m
m = 140 kg (50kg motorcross and 90 kg person)
g = 9.81 m/s^2
h = 1m - this is the height of the fall
Then we get an impact force of F_i = 25066 N
if i use h = 2m, F_i = 35343N

I find that at approximately 2,95m vertical fall the front spring bottoms (it has the shortest length) with a force of F_i = 43242 N. Are my calculations soundproof? Or at least reasonable?
One issue is that the springs have different spring constants, the front has 18 kN/m and the rear 208 kN/m, but used the fact that they were parallel to simplify my calculations but one could make the argument that the front will hit the bottom much earlier.

When i want to use these values in Ansys (Finite element analysis program) i of course can't put the entire load at one place but a big chunk of it is the driver putting at least 75% of his weight at the footpegs which will produce high stresses at some areas I am sure (i can't validate right now).

Im grateful for any advice in this matter :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Fun project! :smile:
DanielSu said:
the front has 18 kN/m and the rear 208 kN/m
Where did you get these numbers? The front and back spring rates are much closer than that, in my experience.

And you should start including the damping of the shock absorbers in your calculations from the beginning, IMO. The damping is a big part of how the suspension works, especially in landings...
DanielSu said:
the driver rider putting at least 75% of his weight at the footpegs
Much closer to 100% :biggrin:

MBwheelie_Reversed.jpg
 

Attachments

  • MBwheelie_Reversed.jpg
    MBwheelie_Reversed.jpg
    68.2 KB · Views: 760
berkeman said:
Fun project! :smile:

Where did you get these numbers? The front and back spring rates are much closer than that, in my experience.

And you should start including the damping of the shock absorbers in your calculations from the beginning, IMO. The damping is a big part of how the suspension works, especially in landings...

Much closer to 100% :biggrin:

View attachment 224979
The front is from a downhill fork (from a bicycle) that's why it so small :) And yes usually they are probably much closer than that.
I thought the damping only was used to dampen the return movement once the spring was first compressed, anyway i got no data of the damping constant and i found by earlier calculations (they might've wrong of course) that it played little or no part in the beginning.
 
DanielSu said:
I thought the damping only was used to dampen the return movement once the spring was first compressed
No, there are damping rates for both compression and "rebound" (usually different). I'll try to find a datasheet for a typical MX shock for you...
DanielSu said:
i found by earlier calculations (they might've wrong of course) that it played little or no part in the beginning.
No, they play a huge part (see the picture of my CRF450R above).
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top