Lorentz and Galilean Tranformations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Icaro Amorim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galilean Lorentz
Icaro Amorim
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At what speed v will the Galilean and Lorentz expressions for x differ by 0,10 percent?

Homework Equations


xL= (x'+vt')/√(1-(v/c)²) (Lorentz Transformation)
xG=x'+vt' (Galilean Tranformation)

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried: xG/xL = √(1-(v/c)²) = 0,1%=0,1/100=10^(-3) => 1-(v/c)² = 10^(-6) => v = [√(1-10^-6)]*c~ 0,999999*c.
Where did I go wrong?

The result is 0,0447c according to the book (Introduction to
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xG/xL = √(1-(v/c)²) = 1-0,1%

"will differ by 0,10 percent"

not "will be 0.10 percent"
 
Thanks, maajdl.

Greetings from Brazil.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top