Lorentz Force Question - Where did the y dot come from ?

Physics Enemy
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Basically the question is about a penning ion trap. You need to use the equation for the Lorentz Force, which I have. It says the trap electrodes have a potential:

V(x,y,z) = A(2z^2 - x^2 - y^2); There's a superimposed uniform B-Field B = B(z hat)

It then asks you to write down an expression for the z-component of the total electromagnetic force on a particle of charge q, explaining why it doesn't depend on B. I did that. It then says write down the equation of motion. I did that.

It then asks you to do the same thing with the x and y components i.e.) Find the x and y components of the total force, write down the equations of motion, etc.

But the solution shows a y dot in the equation of motion in the x-direction:

x double dot = q/m[2Ax + B(y dot)]

Where did this y dot come into it? Any ideas? I thought a V term is next to B?
Thanks guys, muchly appreciated. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\dot{y} is the y-component of the velocity.
 
fzero said:
\dot{y} is the y-component of the velocity.
Thanks, I realized a few mins ago lol. The x and z cross to give the y-direction. For some reason I also thought V was potential, not velocity. It's a little v, of course. :redface:
 
I actually disagree with their answer, shouldn't it be -y dot? x cross z gives -y, I think ...
 
Physics Enemy said:
I actually disagree with their answer, shouldn't it be -y dot? x cross z gives -y, I think ...

The equation you wrote above was for this x component of the force, which contains (\vec{v} \times \vec{B})_x = v_y B_z.
 
fzero said:
The equation you wrote above was for this x component of the force, which contains (\vec{v} \times \vec{B})_x = v_y B_z.
Yes you're right. V x B = (V_y * B)xhat - (V_x * B)yhat + (0)zhat
So the x component is B*ydot, and y component is -B*xdot
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top