No Net Force in E & B Perpendicular Fields

AI Thread Summary
In a velocity selector with perpendicular electric (E) and magnetic (B) fields, the condition for no net force on a charged particle occurs when its velocity (v) is parallel to the cross product of E and B (ExB). If v is parallel to E, the electric force will act in the same direction as v, preventing cancellation with the magnetic force. The key to achieving no net force is ensuring that the magnetic force (qv x B) points in the opposite direction to the electric force (qE) and is equal in magnitude. Using the right-hand rule clarifies that only the condition where v is parallel to (ExB) allows for this cancellation. Thus, the only viable scenario for no net force is when v is aligned with the direction of (ExB).
jesuslovesu
Messages
185
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a velocity selector E and B fields are perpendicular. Which of the following conditions on the direction of the particle's velocity can result in no net force assuming the E and B are nonzero?


Homework Equations


F = Eq + q(vxB)


The Attempt at a Solution


The answer is B.

A) v is parallel to E
--Not sure why this wouldn't work. Since E is perpendicular to B why can't it result in F = 0? F = E + vB

B) v is parallel to (ExB)
--If I recall my cross product information correctly. v will be perpendicular to both E and B therefore I get F = E + vB.

What's the difference between the two?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the fields are non-zero, the only way for there to be no net force is for the electric and magnetic forces to cancel out (i.e. qv X B is pointing in the opposite direction to qE, and is equal in strength.). Thus, you want the velocity to point in a direction that causes the magnetic force to point opposite the electric force.

Say the electric field points up, and the magnetic field points toward you, using the right hand rule, which way will the velocity have to point in order to get (qv X B) to point opposite qE? This is essentially what the question is asking. If you check the two situations above with the right-hand rule, you should see that only one has qvXB pointing opposite to qE. Can you now see why only one of the above situations work?
 
jesuslovesu said:
A) v is parallel to E
--Not sure why this wouldn't work. Since E is perpendicular to B why can't it result in F = 0? F = E + vB
If v is parallel to E, what direction will the force from E act? And what direction must q(vxB) act? Can they possibly cancel?

B) v is parallel to (ExB)
--If I recall my cross product information correctly. v will be perpendicular to both E and B therefore I get F = E + vB.
Do the same analysis as before. Compare the directions of qE and q(vxB). Can they cancel?

G01 is way ahead of me. :-)
 
Understood, thanks
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top