Low load factor and Voltage drops

  • Thread starter Thread starter rozan977
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Load Voltage
AI Thread Summary
Low load factors in distribution transformers lead to increased system losses and voltage drops due to higher reactive currents, which cause voltage drops to subtract directly from the system. This occurs because the series impedance is primarily inductive, resulting in reactive currents contributing to voltage drops differently than real currents. When currents are high for shorter periods, as seen with low load factors, the power loss in the line increases significantly compared to a steady load. The discussion also highlights confusion between load factor and power factor, emphasizing that a low load factor indicates a more variable load, which is less efficient. Understanding these concepts is crucial for managing energy distribution effectively.
rozan977
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
My lecturer, in the notes he provided to us mentioned that low load factor of a distribution transformer results in higher system losses and voltage drops. I thought the by higher system losses he means the iron losses in transformer which is comparably higher in no-load and lower load conditions. But I just couldn't figure out how low load factor causes voltage drops in system?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
He's probably referring to the effect of reactive current causing comparatively much more voltage drop in upstream reactive impedance.

Because the series impedance of the power system is primarily inductive, then the voltage drops due to reactive current tends to subtract directly, whereas those from real current components add vectorally at right angles.

For example, say you had a load taking 1.0 pu reactive current and the series impedance was j0.1 pu. The required generator voltage is 1.1 pu (the voltage drop is in phase so adds algebraically). Now consider the same case but with 1.0 pu real current being supplied. The required generator voltage is now only 1.005 pu (volt drop adds at 90 degrees).
 
uart, I think you are confusing 'Load factor' with 'power factor'.
@rozan977, I think the lecturer is trying to explain what would happen in a distribution system already in existence if the Load factor goes low. In such case, assuming same average monthly consumption, a low load factor means, high currents for shorter period of time, (as compared to the currents being distributed in time, in case of higher load factor).
Higher currents obviously results in higher voltage drop (during the high current period). If we do the maths, we can also see that, when currents are higher for short period and less for longer period (instead of evenly spreading out), the power loss in the line will be higher.
for example, For a building, the current is 10A for whole 24 hours (load factor of 1)
Then its daily energy Loss = 10^2*R*24
In another building, the current is 20A for 12hrs and 0A for 12hrs (same average daily energy). This gives load factor of 0.5.
Then its daily energy loss = 20^2*R*12, which is double of the previous case.
 
I_am_learning said:
uart, I think you are confusing 'Load factor' with 'power factor'.

I think the lecturer is trying to explain what would happen in a distribution system already in existence if the Load factor goes low. In such case, assuming same average monthly consumption, a low load factor means, high currents for shorter period of time, (as compared to the currents being distributed in time, in case of higher load factor).

No, actually I think you're confusing load factor with something like duty factor or duty cycle (the ratio of average to peak).

The load factor of a transformer (at any given point in time) is simply the operating power (at that time) as a ratio or percentage of it's rated power. Since the magnetizing reactance draws approximately constant reactive current (independent of load) then a low load factor implies a worse power factor. So no, I'm not confusing them, they are in fact related.
 
Last edited:
In the book "ELECTRIC POWER DISTRIBUTION
EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS", Author T.A. Short says
T.A. Short said:
• Load factor — The ratio of the average load over the peak load. Peak
load is normally the maximum demand but may be the instantaneous
peak. The load factor is between zero and one. A load factor
close to 1.0 indicates that the load runs almost constantly. A low load
factor indicates a more widely varying load. From the utility point
of view, it is better to have high load-factor loads. Load factor is
normally found from the total energy used (kilowatt-hours) as:
LF = kWh/(dkW*h)
where
LF = load factor
kWh = energy use in kilowatt-hours
dkW = peak demand in kilowatts
h = number of hours during the time period
 
The definition I've got here is:

Transformer Load Factor : Current load / rated load.

Edit. Just googled a few papers on the subject and some authors are using the definition of "current power/rated power" while others are using "average/peak". So yeah, take your pick. :cry:I guess the op will have to let use know what particular definition of "load factor" he's using.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top