Magnetic Field Inducing Electric Field - Lighting a 60W Bulb

AI Thread Summary
To determine the necessary rail length for a 60W bulb to remain lit for half a second using a magnetic field of 0.40 T and a rod length of 0.60 m, Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction is applied. The induced electromotive force (emf) is calculated as 120V, based on the bulb's resistance of 240 ohms. The relationship between emf, velocity, magnetic field, and rod length is expressed as V = vBL. By assuming constant velocity, the required rail length can be derived by multiplying the velocity by the time duration of half a second. This approach provides a clear path to solving the problem despite initial uncertainties regarding calculus.
vaxopy
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Suppose the light bulb in Figure 22.4b is a 60.0-W bulb with a resistance of 240 W. The magnetic field has a magnitude of 0.40 T, and the length of the rod is 0.60 m. The only resistance in the circuit is that due to the bulb. Minimally, how long would the rails on which the moving rod slides have to be, in order that the bulb can remain lit for one-half second?

Anyone know how i can start going about solving this :)?
 

Attachments

  • nw0975-n.gif
    nw0975-n.gif
    5.5 KB · Views: 723
Physics news on Phys.org
hrm...

Faraday's law states that the induced emf is equal to the negative rate of change of magnetic flux. Also the rate of change of magnetic flux is equal to B*dA/dt, since the magnetic field is completely perpendicular to the entire area.

Emf = B*dA/dt, you can relate this to the information given in the problem

remember that emf = I*R
 
please help me..
i don't know much calculus

P = V^2/R
im assuming V = emf in the equation emf = vBL
so

60W = emf^2/240ohms
emf = 120V..

but they do not give me a velocity or anything
im stumped :/
 
The using that V = vBL you can solve for velocity. You already calculated V and B and L are given.

Assuming the velocity is constant you can just multiply 1/2 a second to find the rail length.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top