What is the magnetic field produced by an electron beam in a cathodic ray tube?

AI Thread Summary
In a cathodic ray tube, a circular electron beam with a diameter of 0.22 mm and a kinetic energy of 25 keV produces a magnetic field at a distance of 1.5 mm from its axis. The current generated by the beam, calculated from the flow of 5.6*10^14 electrons per second, is approximately 8.97 * 10^-5 Amperes. The discussion highlights the application of Ampere's law to determine the magnetic field, emphasizing that the shape of the magnetic field lines around a straight current is circular. The kinetic energy of the electrons is deemed irrelevant for this calculation, as the focus is on the current and its magnetic effects. Ultimately, the magnetic field produced by the beam is found to be 12 nT.
fishingspree2
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a cathodic ray tube, the canon launches a circular electron beam on the screen. The beam has a 0.22 mm diameter, the electrons have a kinetic energy of 25 keV and 5.6*10^14 electrons reach the screen each second. Find the magnetic field produced by the beam on a point located at a 1.5mm distance of the beam axis.

The answer is 12 nT


Homework Equations


I know that the magnetic field of a circular arc is
B = (u*i*angle)/(4*Pi*distance) but in this case I don't have an angle so I am pretty sure this is not the correct formula

Also we could integrate using the biot savart rule but we don't have the limits of integration.


The Attempt at a Solution


I have found the current by using the fact that 5.6*10^14 electrons reach the screen each second. By converting electrons to coulombs, I get 8.97 * 10^-5 Amperes. Then I am stuck, I have no idea how to continue

thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should review Ampere's law. Particularly the integral form. By the way, do you remember the shape of the magnetic field line in the vicinity of a current flowing in a straight line?
 
A circle I believe?
 
I still can't do it =( I don't understand what to do with the kinetic energy... I can find the electrons velocity but it would only be useful in the formula F = q v x B and I don't think that would apply here
 
fishingspree2 said:
A circle I believe?

Yes, the magnetic field lines take the shape of a circle going around a current i that is traveling in a straight line.

Now do you know Ampere's law? You have already found the magnitude of the current. Ampere's law involves a line integral taken over a suitable path. This actually is a very simple problem once you check your textbook (or Wikipedia). You will have to simplify a dot product, but that should be no problem.
 
fishingspree2 said:
I still can't do it =( I don't understand what to do with the kinetic energy... I can find the electrons velocity but it would only be useful in the formula F = q v x B and I don't think that would apply here

The kinetic energy is a red herring and F = qv X B is useless in this context.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top