Magnetic fields and charged particles

AI Thread Summary
A charged particle experiences a force in a magnetic field described by F = qV x B, indicating no force when the particle's velocity is zero. If the magnetic field is moving or changing, the particle's kinetic energy can be affected, as described by Maxwell-Faraday's law, which states that a time-varying magnetic field generates an electric field. In this scenario, the particle's frame of reference can lead to different calculations, necessitating the use of induction laws instead of the basic force equation. The discussion highlights that while the standard equation is simpler, understanding the implications of changing magnetic fields is crucial. Overall, the relationship between magnetic fields and charged particles is complex and tied to fundamental electromagnetic principles.
Sefrez
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
It has been stated that a charged particle in the vicinity of a magnetic field experiences a force given by F = qV x B, which states that there is no force when its velocity is zero. It also shows that only the particles direction can be changed, not its kinetic energy.

My question is this: what if you take the frame of reference that the particle has zero velocity and the magnetic field is moving (or changing)? Or simply, you have a stationary charge and pass a magnetic field by it?

In this context, is the kinetic energy of the particle then changed?

If so, is this at all related to, or the base idea of induction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you use F=qv×B this equation, v must be in reference to a non-changing B. If you want to use the reference frame in which the particle is the center of coordinates (ie. v=0), then you must use the induction laws, specifically:

E.dl = -(d/dt)∫∫B.dS, and F=qE

PS. It's so much easier to just use F=qv×B.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top