Magnetic fields and charged particles

AI Thread Summary
A charged particle experiences a force in a magnetic field described by F = qV x B, indicating no force when the particle's velocity is zero. If the magnetic field is moving or changing, the particle's kinetic energy can be affected, as described by Maxwell-Faraday's law, which states that a time-varying magnetic field generates an electric field. In this scenario, the particle's frame of reference can lead to different calculations, necessitating the use of induction laws instead of the basic force equation. The discussion highlights that while the standard equation is simpler, understanding the implications of changing magnetic fields is crucial. Overall, the relationship between magnetic fields and charged particles is complex and tied to fundamental electromagnetic principles.
Sefrez
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
It has been stated that a charged particle in the vicinity of a magnetic field experiences a force given by F = qV x B, which states that there is no force when its velocity is zero. It also shows that only the particles direction can be changed, not its kinetic energy.

My question is this: what if you take the frame of reference that the particle has zero velocity and the magnetic field is moving (or changing)? Or simply, you have a stationary charge and pass a magnetic field by it?

In this context, is the kinetic energy of the particle then changed?

If so, is this at all related to, or the base idea of induction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you use F=qv×B this equation, v must be in reference to a non-changing B. If you want to use the reference frame in which the particle is the center of coordinates (ie. v=0), then you must use the induction laws, specifically:

E.dl = -(d/dt)∫∫B.dS, and F=qE

PS. It's so much easier to just use F=qv×B.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top