Magnetic Flux Calculation: Square Loop in 0.5T Field

  • Thread starter Thread starter domyy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The magnetic flux through a square loop of 2cm x 2cm in a 0.5T magnetic field is calculated using the formula θ = BA, resulting in a value of 2 x 10^-4 Tm^2. Consistency in notation is important, particularly using a capital "T" for Teslas throughout the calculations. Additionally, the flux can also be expressed in Webers (Wb), as Wb is equivalent to Tm^2. The calculations and approach are generally correct, with minor suggestions for notation. Overall, the solution is valid and well-presented.
domyy
Messages
196
Reaction score
0
Can you check my solution?PLEASE:)

Homework Statement



Calculate the magnetic flux through a square loop of 2cm x 2cm oriented perpendicular to a magnetic field of 0.5t.


Homework Equations



θ = BA

The Attempt at a Solution



θ = BA = (0.5t)(0.0004m^2) = 2 x 10^-4 Tm^2.

What do you guys think?
Thanks!:blushing:
 
Physics news on Phys.org


domyy said:

Homework Statement



Calculate the magnetic flux through a square loop of 2cm x 2cm oriented perpendicular to a magnetic field of 0.5t.


Homework Equations



θ = BA

The Attempt at a Solution



θ = BA = (0.5t)(0.0004m^2) = 2 x 10^-4 Tm^2.

What do you guys think?
Thanks!:blushing:

I think that you should use a capital T for Teslas consistently, particularly in the same equation :devil:

Otherwise it's fine.

Note that you might also use the equivalent unit of Webers (Wb) for the flux.

Wb = Tm2 = Vs
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top