Magnetism and human exposure limit

AI Thread Summary
Exposure to magnetic fields at levels around 0.2 Tesla raises concerns about potential health effects, although specific outcomes are not definitively established. Some research indicates that time-varying magnetic fields can be more dangerous than static fields, with reports of fatalities during experiments. The exposure limit is influenced by various factors, and resources from institutions like Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and NASA provide further insights into the risks associated with magnetic fields. Additionally, studies suggest that while static magnetic fields may not extract iron from the bloodstream, they could have other neurological effects. Overall, understanding the implications of magnetic exposure is complex and warrants further investigation.
Lateralus
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey this is more of a general question than a problem...
What happens to a human body after it has reached its magnetic exposure limit (.2 Telsa)? Does the magnetism pull iron out of the blood stream, or cause any severe or fatal health issues? Something must happen, or else there would be no limit. My Physics AP teacher is offering extra credit if we can find any information, so if you know of any sites or can explain it to me, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well I just happened to be checking this out not long ago because of a thread on sci.physics

from Lawrence Livermore National laboratory we have:
http://www.llnl.gov/es_and_h/hsm/doc_20.07/tablea5.pdf

A congress report 110 pages long
http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/ota/Ota_2/DATA/1989/8905.PDF

Not time varying magnectic or electric field can be much more dangrous then static field can be. Some people have died experimenting from time varying magnectic fields. That is what I have read at lest.
Document from NASA on time varying fields 38 pages:
http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/_techrep/TP-2003-212054.pdf

From IEEE we have:(I don't know how old this one is)
http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/elfradiation/epri-ieee1-03d.pdf

Exposure limit depends on may factors I suggest starting witht he IEEE link.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks a bunch...the information is very helpful, not to mention interesting...although I do feel some pity for the rats and mice.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top