Magnetism - the proportionality constant question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation of the equation for the magnetic field (B) around a long wire, specifically addressing the origin of the 2π factor. The 2π arises from integrating around a circle of radius r, representing the circumference. Participants clarify that this magnetic field can be derived using Ampere's Law and the Biot-Savart Law. The equation mentioned includes the permeability of free space (μ0) and relates current (I) to the magnetic field at a distance (r). Understanding these principles is essential for grasping the behavior of magnetic fields generated by current-carrying wires.
dragon513
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
cb89c25072088f55cddf1b60ce6bd8a9.png


Hi! Can anyone please tell me where this equation was derived from?
This equation is used to get the magnetic field (B).
I is current and r is the distance. And I think I understand the Meu. And yet I have no idea where the 2pi came from. I looked in my textbook, internet and asked friends but nobody seems to know.

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That is the magnitude of the magnetic field carried by a long wire. I think you meant r instead of y in the equation you displayed. You obtain it by simple application of Ampere's Law and the 2\pi r comes from integrating around a circle of radius r (i.e. it's the circumference of the circle).
 
Well, that's the magnetic field from an infinite straight wire, which you can get using Biot-Savart:

d\vec{B} = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \frac{I \vec{dl} \times \hat{r}}{r^2}

Biot-Savart is derived from Ampere's Law:

\int_C \vec{B} \cdot \vec{dl} = \mu_0 \int_S \vec{J} \cdot \vec{da}
 
aha, thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top