Majorana representation of Gamma matrices.

arroy_0205
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
It is well known that at times we do need explicit representations for the Dirac gamma matrices while doing calculations with fermions. Recently I found two different expressions for Majorana representation for the gamma matrices. In one paper, the form used is:
[tex] \gamma_{0} = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 & i\sigma_2\\<br /> i\sigma_2 & 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/tex]
[tex] \gamma_{1} = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \sigma_1 & 0\\<br /> 0 & \sigma_1<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/tex]
[tex] \gamma_{2} = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0 & -i\sigma_2\\<br /> i\sigma_2 & 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/tex]
[tex] \gamma_{3} = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \sigma_3 & 0\\<br /> 0 & \sigma_3<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/tex]
[tex] \gamma_{5} = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \sigma_2 & 0\\<br /> 0 & \sigma_2<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/tex]
However in wikipedia article on gamma matrices, the Majorana representations are diffenrent and all are complex matrices. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_matrices#Majorana_basis
I am confused which is the actual representation of Majorana representation? Or are both representations valid Majorana representations? Note that in the rep. I wrote, the first four matrices are real matrices.

Also can anybody tell me how to write several matrices side-by-side in latex?
Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there any definite rule to obtain gamma matrix representations? Or can I use my own representations if I find the matrices satisfy the anticommutation relations? Is there any limit on the number of possible representations of gamma matrices in a given dimension?
 
gamma matrices are only defined up to similarity transformations; which representation or basis you wish to use is up to you.
 
They're also amongst the leading causes of stress disorders amongst physicists.

The number of times a factor of i, or -1 from a mismatch of conventions with them, has bungled a calculation at this point is a matter of historical importance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K