Mass flow rate through De Laval Nozzle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass flow rate through a De Laval nozzle, where the user initially struggles with discrepancies between theoretical and experimental results. Key parameters include water density, nozzle dimensions, and the coefficient of discharge. The user discovers that the error stemmed from using pressure differences in the wrong units, which, when corrected from Pascals to Kilopascals, resolved the discrepancies. The user expresses disappointment in the lack of community assistance during the troubleshooting process. The thread concludes with a note on the inability to mark the discussion as solved.
darksupernova
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,


Ive got a little stuck calculating the mass flow rate of a choked flow through a de laval nozzle.

I have been given a formula to use for theoretical max and experimental but they seem to be SO far apart, I am sure I am missing something.

Given data:

Density of water 1000 kg/m^3
Throat diameter (nozzle) 4.79mm
Exit diameter (nozzle) 5.54mm
Probe diameter 3.30mm
Coefficient of discharge of orifice plate 0.6
orifice diameter 27.03mm
pipe diameter 76.2mm
gamma ratio of specific heats 1.4
gas constant 287 J/(kg K)
Absolute zero 273 degrees c / 0 K
Delta H = 2" = 0.0508m

See useful equations in attached image.

The manometer had water in it, and thus rho g H uses water density and delta H as above.

Please also see my attempt in the attached images for the theoretical and experimental equations.

The problem, they seem to be miles apart, am I using the correct diameters?

What am I getting wrong?

I hope you can help!

Thanks,

Max
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0089.jpg
    IMAG0089.jpg
    36.4 KB · Views: 945
  • IMAG0090.jpg
    IMAG0090.jpg
    36.7 KB · Views: 737
  • IMAG0093.jpg
    IMAG0093.jpg
    38.6 KB · Views: 754
Physics news on Phys.org
Update: I found the error. For p1-p2 I had the pressure difference in Pascals when of course the difference would be in Kilo Pascals, this unit change fixed the errors and gave me sensible answers. Little sad that nobody on here was any help! :(

Also I cannot see how to mark this thread as [Solved], it won't let me edit my original post.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top