What is the Correct Speed of the Heavier Fragment in a Weather Rocket Explosion?

AI Thread Summary
A 1500 kg weather rocket accelerates upward at 10 m/s² and explodes 2 seconds after liftoff, breaking into two fragments with one being twice as massive as the other. The lighter fragment reaches a maximum height of 530 m, prompting the question of the heavier fragment's speed immediately after the explosion. One user calculated the speed to be 20.96 m/s but received feedback indicating a potential rounding error or incorrect significant figures. Another user derived the initial velocity using momentum conservation and kinematic equations, arriving at a speed of 21.0 m/s, which aligns with the system's evaluation. The discussion highlights the importance of significant figures and proper calculations in solving physics problems.
physicsCU
Messages
198
Reaction score
1
Not sure of the number, but it is about a weather rocket that explodes.

A 1500 kg weather rocket accelerates upward at 10\;{\rm m}/{\rm s}^{2} . It explodes 2.0 s after liftoff and breaks into two fragments, one twice as massive as the other. Photos reveal that the lighter fragment traveled straight up and reached a maximum height of 530 m.

That is the problem.

What was the speed of the heavier fragment just after the explosion?

That is the question.

I solved and got 20.96 m/s. It gives me this error:

You are close. You may have made a rounding error or used the wrong number of significant figures.

Help! What is the right answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did u get that #...?How many sign.digits are u required to use...?

Daniel.
 
Using the 10m/s^2 * 2s, i got the v_i to be 20 m/s, p_i then is 30000 kg*m/s.

p_f is 1000*v_f_1 + 500*v_f_2

Used v_f^2 = v_i^2 + 2*a*s on the smaller mass fragment. Used v_f = 0, a = -9.8, s given in problem. Solved for v_i. This v_i is the inital velocity of the fragment, aka its velocity at the end of the explosion.

Set 30000 = 1000*v_f_1 + 500*v_f_2, using v_f_2 from dynamics equation work above. solved for v_f_1.

EDIT: The system is evaluating my answer as 21.0, so i think my sig figs are right. Unless the server is broken, which could be the case.
 
Anyone have any ideas?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top