Matrix Representation of S_z Using Eigenkets of S_y

indigojoker
Messages
240
Reaction score
0
Show the matrix representation of S_z using the eigenkets of S_y as base vectors.

I'm not quite sure on the entire process but here's what i think:

We get the transformation matrix though:

U = \sum_k |b^{(k)} \rangle \langle a^{(k)} |

where |b> is the eigenket for S_y and <a| is the eigenket for S_z

this will give me a change of basis operator that i can operate on the S_z operator to get it into the S_y basis.

would this be the correct though process?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks fine.

Note: |a> is an eigenket for S_z; <a| would be an eigenbra that is in dual correspondence with |a>.
 
I get:

U =\left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} |+ \rangle \langle +| + \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}} |- \rangle \langle +| \right) + \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} |+ \rangle \langle -| - \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}} |- \rangle \langle -| \right)

U= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left(\begin{array}{cc}1&amp;1\\i&amp;-i\end{array}\right)

US_z=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{\hbar}{2}\left(\begin{array}{cc}1&amp;1\\i&amp;-i\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{cc}1&amp;0\\0&amp;-1\end{array}\right)

thus, S-z in S_y basis is:
S_z=\frac{\hbar\sqrt{2}}{4}\left(\begin{array}{cc}1&amp;-1\\i&amp;i\end{array}\right)

looks okay?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top