Matrix Vector Spaces: Invertible Basis?

venom192
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Does the vector space of all square matrices have a basis of invertible matrices?

Homework Equations



No relevant equations.

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the 2x2 case has an invertible basis, but I don't know how to generalize it for the vector space of all nxn matrices. Any hint would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you find a basis of the square matrices (without the requirement that every element of the basis should be invertible)??
 
Here's what I'm thinking.
Take a basis of vector space of square matrices V, such that each matrix has a single 1 and all other elements are 0.
If you take a basis {v1, ... vn} and replace vk with c1v1 + ... + cnvn, you still get a basis, as long as ck is not 0. That is easy to prove, if needed.
Take some invertible matrix m1 = c1v1 + ... + cnvn in V, such that c1 is not 0 and replace v1 with it. I'm going to build an invertible matrix m2 = m1 + a2v2. Since det is a linear function, we can write it as kx + b, where x is some element of the matrix. The thing to prove is that if kx+b ≠ 0, then there exists 'a' ≠ 0 such that k(x+a) + b ≠ 0. The condition implies that k and b can't be both 0, so (due to linearity) there exists at most 1 point where k(x+a)+b = 0. We can always choose a different one, thus we can always build m2. Likewise mn = mn-1 + anvn, gives an invertible basis {m1, ..., mn}
 
Well first of all, the determinant is not a linear function.

But you have a nice idea. Just take a matrix with 0 everywhere but on one place a 1. This is obviously not invertible. But can you modify it so that it becomes invertible? Try to do some stuff to the diagonal.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top