Apply Mean Value Theorem to Show arctan x - x = 0 at x = 0

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the Mean Value Theorem to demonstrate that the function arctan x - x equals zero only at x = 0. Participants clarify that the Mean Value Theorem requires the function to be differentiable on the interval, which arctan x - x is. They explore the implications of the derivative, noting that f'(x) = sec²(x) - 1 equals zero only at specific points, which do not fall within the relevant interval. The conversation shifts to the Intermediate Value Theorem, emphasizing that if the function is continuous and changes signs, it must cross zero at some point. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the importance of understanding both the Mean Value Theorem and the Intermediate Value Theorem in this context.
sonya
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
oks...im having problems applying the mean value theorem...i understand the concept behind it but whenever i try 2 do a question i have no idea wat 2 do...heres 1 question I've been trying:

Showing all your work, apply the Mean Value Theorem to show
that the function arctan x - x is equal to zero only at x = 0 .

where do i start? thx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The mean value theorem says that if f is differentiable on (a,b) then for some c between a and b, f'(c)= (f(b)- f(a))/(b-a).

Certainly tan(x) is differentiable for x between -pi/2 and pi/2 so also is tan(x)- x.

Suppose tan(b)- b= 0 for some b (between -pi/2 and pi/2). Apply the mean value theorem between 0 and b.
There must be a point c between 0 and b so that f'(c)= (f(b)- f(a))/(b-a) = 0. But for f(x)= tan(x)- x, f'(x)= sec2(x)- 1.
f'(x)= 0 means sec2(x)= 1 or sec(x)= +/- 1. That only happens at 0 and pi/2 NOT between 0 and 1.
 
Huh. That's not the mean value theorem that I'm familiar with. (In fact, it's not true unless the derivative is contiuous.)

The version I'm familiar with is more like:

If f is continuous on [a,b] then there is some point c; a \leq c \leq b so that f(c)=\frac{f(a)+f(b)}{2}

Now, you know that
f(x)=\arctan{x}-x
is continuous.
If you can show that it is always less than zero for x>0 and alwauys greather than zero for x<0, and that there must be some point where it is zero (mean value theorem might be usefull here), then you're done.
 
I think you're thinking of the intermediate value theorem:

If f(x) is continuous on the interval [a, b], then for any x between f(a) and f(b), there exists a c \in (a, b) such that f(c) = x.
 
Last edited:
I guess that's what getting too much higher math does to my brain. ...
Not to mention that it's easy prove that |arctan x| < |x| for (x &neq; 0) without resorting to calculus.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top