Mechanics: Moments of force in a rigid beam

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the forces at points A and B on a rigid beam subjected to multiple forces while ensuring the total force and moments about point A are zero. The participant calculates the moment created by forces at points C and D, determining that force B must act in the negative x-direction to maintain equilibrium. The moment equations are set up, leading to the conclusion that the magnitude of force B is approximately -5.92. The reasoning is supported by the need for force B to counteract the counterclockwise rotation caused by the 25 kN force. The analysis confirms the approach is correct, emphasizing the importance of directionality in force calculations.
JohanM
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the rigid beam below, which is loaded by five forces shown. The forces at A and B act to keep the total force on the bar equal to zero and the sum of the moments about point A equal to zero.
a) Find the forces at A and B that satisfy the conditions stated above.
b) Find the sum of the moments about point B.
2ylp4k1.png

Homework Equations


\vec{M} = \vec{r} \times \vec{F}


The Attempt at a Solution


For part A, I figured that I can calculate the magnitude of FB by adding all of the moments about point A and separating |Fb|

Force C: creates 0 moment about point A since its direction is towards A (theta=180)

Force D:

\vec{r} = \left\langle 1000,-200 \right\rangle
\vec{F} = \langle 25 cos(20^\circ), 25 sin(20^\circ) \rangle

\vec{M}=\left| \begin{array}{ccc}\hat{i}&\hat{j}\\1000&-200 \\ 25 cos(20^\circ)&25 sin(20^\circ) \end{array} \right| \approx 3852.04 \hat{k}

Force B:

\vec{r} = \left\langle 1000,-650 \right\rangle
\vec{F} = \langle |\vec{F_{B}}|, 0 \rangle

\vec{M}=\left| \begin{array}{ccc}\hat{i}&\hat{j}\\1000&-650 \\ |\vec{F_{B}}|&0\end{array} \right| = 650 |\vec{F_{B}}| \hat{k}


\sum \vec{M}=O\hat{k}+3852.04...\hat{k}+650|\vec{F_{B}}|\hat{k}=0

|\vec{F_{B}}| \approx -5.92

Before I go any further I just want to make sure that I am approaching this correctly... Does it make sense that FB points in the negative x-direction?

Thanks,
Johan
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think so, if the drawing is roughly to scale the 25kN force tends to rotate the beam counter clockwise therefore for the beam not to move the force at B must tend to rotate the beam clockwise and can only do so if the force at B acts to the left.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top