Member forces of a simple Truss

AI Thread Summary
To solve for member forces in a simple truss using the method of joints, it's essential to start with the reactions at the supports before analyzing the joints. The initial approach involves applying equilibrium equations for each joint, but many unknowns can complicate the process. The discussion highlights that beginning with the simplest joints, such as Joint B, can facilitate the calculations. Once the reactions are determined, the remaining forces can be calculated more easily from other joints. This methodical approach ensures a clearer path to finding the member forces in the truss.
twenty5
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


hi all, I've got a simple truss question. Which asks to solve for the member forces. I've learned the stuff in class, but from what I see here, I don't know which joint to start with. With the provided image below, can someone please direct me to which joint I should start with? and I'll try to take that concept into the other questions. Thanks!

More info. I'm trying to solve through method of joints... so I'm breaking it up into many joints

Homework Equations


(net)Fx = 0
(net)Fy = 0

[PLAIN]http://img571.imageshack.us/img571/2452/truss.png

The Attempt at a Solution


I started by assuming some forces on the supports

+Ay, +Dx, and +Dy

I wrote out all of the joints with their equilibrium equations, but they all have too many unknown variables :/. If someone can just give me a push start it would be nice ^^; thanks!If I start with Join A, I get:

Fx = 0 ; a + dcos36.9 =0
Fy = 0 ; Ay + dsin36.9 = 0

pretty much happens with the rest of the joints too :S... Unless there are some substitutions to be done ^^
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
OOOH NVM NVM NVM NVM.; I GOT IT. thanks for the consideration of this thread though. ^^

For those who may also encounter this ^^ you have to use the moment equations to get the reactions at the supports. From this, you can calculate the rest of the values ^^ very happy. thanks ( thanking myself hahaha )
 
Yes, always solve for the reactions first, then start with the simplest joints. Joint B is very simple, then joint A and D. The rest will follow.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top