Method to find the centre of a conic section from its equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter zorro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Section
AI Thread Summary
To find the center of a conic section from its equation, one can differentiate the equation with respect to x and y, treating the other variable as constant, and then solve the resulting equations. The theory behind this method involves transforming any conic section into a standard form where the center is easily identifiable. The discussion clarifies that differentiating does not change the coordinate system, as it requires specific variables. Additionally, the concepts of rotations and translations are explained in relation to how they affect coordinate systems. Understanding these transformations is crucial for applying the differentiation method effectively.
zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0
In the second degree equation of a conic section (ellipse/hyperbola), I have seen many books following this method to find out the centre of the conic section-

1) Differentiate the equation w.r.t x treating y as constant
2) Differentiate the equation w.r.t y treating x as constant.
3) Solve the above two equations to find out the centre of the curve

I searched many books but did not find the theory behind it.
Can anyone explain me?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Any conic section can be written in the form f(x, y)= A(x- x_0)^2+ B(y- y_0)^2= C for some number A and B, in some coordinate system (with coordinate axes parallel to the axes of symmetry of the conic section), and (x_0, y_0) as center in that coordinate system.

In this case, f_x= 2A(x- x_0)= 0 and f_y= 2B(y- y_0)= 0 so that x= x_0 and y= y_0. For the general equation you need that any coordinate system can be transformed into this coordinate system by rotations and translations which transform linear equations into linear equations.
 
HallsofIvy said:
which transform linear equations into linear equations.

I did not get this.
One more thing, by the process of differentiation, are we changing the co-ordinate system?
 
Abdul Quadeer said:
I did not get this.
Do you understand what I mean by "rotations" and "translations"? What happens, say, to the line y= mx if you translate it by adding a to x and adding b to y? What happens if you rotate around the origin by an angle \theta.

One more thing, by the process of differentiation, are we changing the co-ordinate system?
Of course not. In order to be able to differentiate with respect to "x" and "y", we must have variables "x" and "y" which means a specific coordinate system.
 
  • Like
Likes Ravi tej
Thanks!
I got it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top