Minimum linear velocity attained by sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a sphere moving on a rough surface, where it initially rolls with slipping due to the condition v > ωR. The participants analyze the equations governing the motion, particularly focusing on the frictional force acting in the backward direction and its impact on the sphere's linear and angular velocities. There is confusion regarding the term "minimum linear velocity," with some arguing it refers to the point where slipping stops rather than an actual minimum. A debate arises over the necessity of a negative sign in the equations, with differing opinions on how it affects the acceleration and velocity calculations. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of motion dynamics and the importance of accurately representing forces in equations.
utkarshakash
Gold Member
Messages
852
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


A sphere of mass M and radius R is moving on a rough fixed surface, having co-efficient of friction μ, with a velocity v towards right and angular velocity ω clockwise. It will attain a minimum linear velocity at time (take v>ωR)

The Attempt at a Solution


Since v>ωR the sphere rolls with slipping. So frictional force will act in the backward direction. Using the equation \int \tau dt = \int dL where τ=μmgR.

\mu mgRt= \frac{2}{5} mR^2 (\omega &#039; - \omega) \\<br /> <br /> \mu mg = m \frac{dv}{dt} \\<br /> <br /> \mu gt = (v&#039; - v)<br />

Using the relation v'=ω'R and solving the above two equations I get
t= 2(v-ωR)/3μg. But the correct answer has 7 in the denominator.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
utkarshakash said:
\mu mg = m \frac{dv}{dt}
There is a minus sign missing.

I don't see why this point is called "minimum linear velocity" - it is the point where the sphere stops slipping.
 
mfb said:
There is a minus sign missing.

I don't see why this point is called "minimum linear velocity" - it is the point where the sphere stops slipping.

Why there should be a minus sign? Since friction acts backwards, so is the acceleration. Hence both minus cancels out. Are you trying to say that since velocity is decreasing that's why dv/dt should carry a '-' with it?
 
Acceleration is backwards, but as you write your equation both sides are positive, so v increases. You can use a negative v everywhere, but then things get really confusing and the initial v>ωR does not work.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top