Calculating Density of Aluminium Using Debye Theory

AI Thread Summary
The density of aluminum was calculated using Debye theory, yielding an atom density of 2.24E28 m^-3 at 600K, resulting in an estimated density of 1000 kg m^-3. This estimate significantly deviates from the true density of 2700 kg m^-3. The discrepancy arises because the Debye model does not account for the strong interatomic forces that enhance atomic packing density. These forces contribute additional mass, leading to a higher true density than predicted. Understanding the limitations of the Debye model is crucial for accurate density calculations in materials.
alfredbester
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I've calculates the density of aluminium using the debye theory.
I found The atom density n = 2.24E28 m^-3 at 600k (assumed to be the same as at room temperature).
Therefore the density is just the molecular mass m (m(grams) = (79amu / Avogadros number), multiplied by the atom density. Which I found to be 1000 kg m^-3.
I'm asked to compared to this with a true value of 2700 Kg m^-3.

My estimate just assumes all the mass is the atoms, but I'm not sure why the discrepancy is so large. I thought the majority of the mass of a solid was in the atoms.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The discrepancy is due to the fact that the Debye model does not take into account the strong interatomic forces that exist in materials. These interatomic forces cause atoms to be packed more densely than what would be expected from a simple atom density calculation. The additional mass comes from these interatomic forces and the accompanying increased atomic packing density. This increased mass results in a higher true value than what was estimated using the Debye model.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top