Missing step: Euler-Lagrange equations for the action integral

alfredblase
Messages
228
Reaction score
0
Hi its me again, stuck once more. Sorry guys and gals :P
Ok a problem I found on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_(physics)
In a 1-D case how do we get from:
\delta S = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} [L(x + \varepsilon, \dot{x} + \dot{\varepsilon})-L(x,\dot{x})]dt
to:
\delta S = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \left(\varepsilon \frac{\pd L}{\pd x} + \dot{\varepsilon} \frac {\pd L} {\pd \dot{x}}\right)dt
where \varepsilon = x_1(t) - x(t)
and where the first order expansion of L in ε and ε′ is used? I don't even know what that last phrase means, so if someone could explain that to me too, that would be great.
Thankyou very much.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider a real-valued function of 2 variables, say f = f(x,y). Taylor's theorem for multivariable calculus gives

<br /> f(x + \Delta x , y + \Delta y) - f(x,y) = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \Delta x + \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \Delta y + ...<br />

In your variation principle, L is a function of the "independent variables" x and \dot{x}, so

<br /> L(x + \varepsilon , \dot{x} + \dot{\varepsilon}) - L(x,\dot{x}) = \frac{\partial L}{\partial x} \varepsilon + \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}} \dot{\varepsilon} + ...<br />

Neglecting the ... (i.e., the terms higher than first-order) gives the desired result.

Note: the "independent variables" actually are functions themselves.

Regards,
George
 
Last edited:
Thanks George! =)

Edit: just posting a version of the last formula that shows correctly;

L (x + \varepsilon , \dot{x} + \dot{\varepsilon}) - L (x, \dot{x}) = \frac{\partial L}{\partial x} \varepsilon + \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}} \dot{\varepsilon} + ...
 
Last edited:
need more help on this one sorry...

I still don't understand how to get from one to other. I thought boning up on the Taylor theorem for multiple variables wouldn't be too hard, but I was wrong.
Can some one post a step by step, dummies guide to getting from:
f(x + \Delta x , y + \Delta y) - f(x,y)
to:
\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \Delta x + \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \Delta y + ...
please?
thanx
38
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top