Mixed states and pure states: what's the difference?

jeebs
Messages
314
Reaction score
5
Hi,
this is probably a straightforward question over something simple but it's confusing me. I don't get what the difference is between a mixed state, a superposition and a pure state. I'm looking through my notes about density operators and it's talking about a qubit system where |0> = \left(\begin{array}{c}1&0\end{array}\right) and |1> = \left(\begin{array}{c}0&1\end{array}\right).

It then goes on to talk about the system being in state |+> = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0> + |1>), but it calls it a "pure state". This does not look pure to me, I would have called |0> and |1> the pure states, and |+> superposition of the two.

Using the basis { |+>, |-> }, where |-> = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0> - |1>), the density operator can be found: \rho = \left(\begin{array}{cc}1&0\\0&0\end{array}\right).
The notes say that "the statistical mixture of pure states giving rise to the density operator is called a mixed state". |+> certainly looked like a statistical mixture of |0> and |1> to me. Is there a difference between a mixed state and a superposition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're confusing "pure" with "basis". All states that can be named with a ket from that Hilbert space are pure.

In the (0,1) basis, that ket has density matrix
\left( \begin{matrix} 1/2 & 1/2 \\ 1/2 & 1/2 \end{matrix} \right)

An equally weighted statistical mixture of |0> and |1> would have density matrix
\left( \begin{matrix} 1/2 & 0 \\ 0 & 1/2 \end{matrix} \right)
 
Note that a state is a pure state if and only if the density matrix is such that rho^2 = rho. In Hurkyl's examples, note that the first density matrix of the superposition has the property that rho^2 = rho, but for the second one, rho^2 is not equal to rho. Alternatively, we can say that it is a pure state if and only if Trace(rho^2) = 1.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top