Calculating Hydrostatic and Gravitational Forces in Fluid Mechanics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Forceflow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluids
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the ratio of hydrostatic force to gravitational force in a fluid mechanics scenario involving a cylindrical barrel and an open tube filled with water. The calculated ratio is 2, indicating that the hydrostatic force on the barrel's bottom is greater than the gravitational force acting on the water. This discrepancy arises because the hydrostatic force includes the weight of the water in both the barrel and the tube, while the gravitational force only accounts for the water in the barrel. The ratio is not equal to 1.0 due to the additional mass of water in the tube contributing to the hydrostatic pressure. Understanding these forces is crucial for fluid mechanics applications.
Forceflow
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
In Figure 14-31, an open tube of length L = 1.8 m and cross-sectional area A = 4.6 cm2 is fixed to the top of a cylindrical barrel of diameter D = 1.2 m and height H = 1.8 m. The barrel and tube are filled with water (to the top of the tube). Calculate the ratio of the hydrostatic force on the bottom of the barrel to the gravitational force on the water contained in the barrel.
Why is that ratio not equal to 1.0? (You need not consider the atmospheric pressure.)

I calculated the ratio and the ratio is 2. However, i have no clue to why that ratio wouldn't be equal to one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Forceflow said:
In Figure 14-31, an open tube of length L = 1.8 m and cross-sectional area A = 4.6 cm2 is fixed to the top of a cylindrical barrel of diameter D = 1.2 m and height H = 1.8 m. The barrel and tube are filled with water (to the top of the tube). Calculate the ratio of the hydrostatic force on the bottom of the barrel to the gravitational force on the water contained in the barrel.
Why is that ratio not equal to 1.0? (You need not consider the atmospheric pressure.)

I calculated the ratio and the ratio is 2. However, i have no clue to why that ratio wouldn't be equal to one.
Why not show us what you did.

The gravitational force on the water contained in the barrel is the weight of the water in the barrel, which is equal to its mass x gravitational acceleration: Mg.

The hydrostatic force on the bottom of the barrel is equal to the weight of the water above it: weight of water in both tube and barrel.

So the ratio is M/(M+m) where M is the mass of the barrel and m is the mass of the water in the tube. That should be 100/(100+1)

AM
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top