Motion of Cylinders: Comparing Speed and Factors

  • Thread starter Thread starter spekky_bandit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylinders Motion
spekky_bandit
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Question:

Two light cylinderical cans roll down an inclined slope. One is filled with water, which may be assumed to act without friction, the other is filled with ice which sticks to the insides of the can. Which attains the higher speed and by what factor?

Solution:

The maths of this scenario is straight forward but I don't know how to distinguish between the two cans. I know that I either have to consider one rolling while the other skids thus I deal with rotational and kinetic energies or I have to consider different moments of inertia.

Can one of them be considered hollow or does one skid instead of roll and more inmportantly why for either?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well i just rolled two cans of soda down a plane, and the soda with liquid in it beat the empty can. and then I rolled a full soda can and a solid candle, and it appears that the full soda can acts like a solid cylinder. But I was wondering if they meant that the liquid inside the can has no friction with the walls of the container, otherwise if it was just skidding down the ramp it wouldn't matter if you filled it with water. not completely sure though.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top