Multi-Species Ideal Gas Law and Mean Molecular Mass

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between energy density (u) and temperature in a multi-species ideal gas, specifically involving neutral hydrogen, ionized hydrogen, and free electrons. The established formula for monatomic gases, u = (3/2) n k T, applies to each particle species, indicating that mean kinetic energy remains constant at 3/2 k T, irrespective of mass. The participants confirm that the factor of mean molecular mass (μ) is not necessary in this context, as the energy density is determined by kinetic motion rather than mass differences. Additionally, the potential energy of charged particles is noted to be volume-dependent, which may complicate the analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Ideal Gas Law
  • Familiarity with Boltzmann's constant (k)
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy contributions in thermodynamics
  • Basic concepts of astrophysical plasmas
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of energy density in multi-species ideal gases
  • Research the role of potential energy in charged particle systems
  • Investigate the cooling curves of astrophysical plasmas
  • Learn about the vibrational and rotational energy contributions in diatomic gases
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and students studying thermodynamics or plasma physics, particularly those interested in energy density calculations in multi-species systems.

Allday
Messages
164
Reaction score
1
Hi forums. I have what I think is a simple question but I'm making myself confused. I'm trying to work out the relationship between energy density ( u = energy per unit volume ) and temperature in a multi-species ideal gas (no molecules just different mass ions). The simplest example of something like this would be a hydrogen gas and the species would be neutral hydrogen, ionized hydrogen, and free electrons. I assume all species are at the same temperature. I know the monatomic answer is,

u = \frac{3}{2} n k T

where n is the number density of all particles and k is Boltzmann constant. I'm trying to decide if I need to add a factor of the mean molecular mass ( \mu = the mean mass of an ion divided by the proton mass) in this relation for the multi-species case. \mu is dimensionless so I can't decide on the basis of dimensional analysis.

I suppose the question is equivalent to asking if the energy density of a box of hydrogen at a fixed temperature is equal to that of a box of helium at the same temperature ... the more I think about this, the more I'm thinking the factor of \mu is not needed. Can anyone confirm this?
Any help appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Your expression is correct for the kinetic energy contribution to the energy density. Each particle species has mean kinetic energy 3/2kT, regardless of mass. The potential energy of a system of charged particles will be volume dependent though, so this expression may not get you very far.
 
thanks gadong. I'm modeling the cooling curve for astrophysical plasmas (i.e. low density and globally charge neutral) so I'm just interested in that portion of energy which comes from kinetic motion of the particles.
 
Are you sure you can ignore rotational energy?
 
To clarify, my comment referred to H/H+/e- particles, so I may have mislead you. For diatomic species like H2 the mean *classical* energy consists of:

translational kinetic energy (of entire molecule): 3/2kT
rotational: kT
vibrational: 0.5kT.

In total, 3kT, or the same as the two atoms considered in isolation (as it should be).

For a quantum system, the above values of the vibrational and rotational energies represent the high temperature limits.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K