Multi-variable quadratic question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a multi-variable quadratic equation related to heights in a physics problem. The equation h1(h2-h1)=h3(h2-h3) is manipulated to express h3 in terms of h1 and h2. By rearranging and expanding the equation, a quadratic form is derived: h3^2 - h2h3 + h1(h2 - h1) = 0. The solutions include h3 = h2 - h1 and h3 = h1, with the discriminant revealing a perfect square that simplifies the solution process. The conversation highlights the importance of proper variable manipulation in quadratic equations.
Ragoza
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At the end of a much longer problem, I'm asked to find a second height that will satisfy a formula found for a height in the first part of the problem where:

Homework Equations


h1(h2-h1)=h3(h2-h3)

The Attempt at a Solution


I know the answer I should get: h3=h2-h1

But I cannot figure how to manipulate the variables to get that. I've tried using the quadratic equation but get lost under the square root sign. This has got to be easier than I'm making it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Multiply it out both sides and rearrange:

h2h1 -h1² = h2h3 - h3²

h2h1 - h2h3 = h2(h1 - h3) = h1² - h3² = (h1 + h3)(h1 - h3)

divide by (h1-h3)
 
Wow, thank you. It's been awhile since I've done this stuff!
 
You want to get a quadratic with h3 as the variable and the other heights as constants (because you want h3 *in terms of* those other two heights). So expand the right hand side (but not the left) and rearrange:

h_3^2 - h_2 h_3 + h_1 (h_2 -h_1) = 0

There's your quadratic. a = 1, b = h2, c = left hand side of the original equation.

Now, it's messy, but the two solutions you'll get are the one you're expecting, and another one, namely h3 = h1 (which is obviously a solution, by inspection).

Hint: Your discriminant is:

h_2^2 - 4h_1(h_2 - h_1)

= h_2^2 - 4h_1h_2 + 4h_1^2

This is a *perfect square*, making things really easy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top