Multiple Input Closed-Loop Transfer Function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the closed-loop transfer function for a system with two inputs, including a disturbance. The user successfully calculates the transfer function for a single input but struggles to combine the results for both inputs into a single output/input format. They attempt to use principles from a referenced website but are confused about applying the concept of rejecting disturbances and ensuring precise tracking of command inputs. The user seeks clarification on whether these principles are universally applicable or specific to the example provided. Understanding these concepts is crucial for modeling the system and studying the effects of delay.
skyryan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am given a block diagram (attached below) with 2 inputs (one being disturbance) and I need to find the closed-loop transfer function. I can get the closed-loop transfer function just fine for a normal 1 input system, but I have yet come across one with 2 inputs. I need the closed loop-transfer function because I need to model this system to study the effects of a delay.


Homework Equations


List of Variables
Kp, Ti, s, Ki, A

C(s) = Kp*((1+Tis)/(Tis))
G(s) = 50/(1+0.2s)


The Attempt at a Solution


I know that to get the output, I simply;
  1. equate one of the input as 0 and find the closed-loop transfer function
  2. repeat the same step for the other input
  3. add the two closed loop transfer function together to get the output

However, I end up with
h = ...*(hd) + ...*(qo)

How am I supposed to get it in the form output/input?


Thank you very much for your time and help
 

Attachments

  • control.jpg
    control.jpg
    5.4 KB · Views: 1,446
Physics news on Phys.org
After working on this for the past hour, I found this website to reitterate what I thought would be the way to find the closed-loop transfer function.

http://www.atp.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/rt1/syscontrol/node51.html#fig:5.1.2"

However, I am once again finding myself struggling to understand where they went after they get it in the form

output = ...*(input1) + ...*(input2)

From their reasoning, they say that

b)
Disturbances should be rejected or they must have a small influence on the controlled variable .

c)
The controlled variable should track the command input as precisely and as fast as possible.

and hence made disturbance 0. Can I use this principle as well or is this only specific to the example shown?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...
Back
Top